New forum topics
- Support to help lone parents into work
- Average time for DLA appeal 25.5 weeks for period 1st April 2011 to 31 December 2011
- Government support towards the additional living costs of working-age disabled people: Government Response
- Housing Benefit Claims reach 5 million in February 2012
- Simon Gillespie, chief executive of the MS Society Appointed to WCA independent review scruitiny group
- Body Positive North West - closed
- Fraud and Error in the Benefit System - 17 May 2012 New Preliminary 2011/12 estimates
- 8 May 2012 – Government gives one year’s notice of benefit cap
- DMG 22/12 Memo - ESA: Admission to Hospital - TREATED AS HAVING LCW: HOSPITAL IN–PATIENT
- Amount of local housing allowance where extra bedroom required due to needs of disabled person - rightsnet.org.uk
Recent comments
- Stage 1 Report on the Welfare Reform Scotland
1 day 15 hours ago - Recording ESA
1 day 15 hours ago - ES050 0311 review form reply
1 day 15 hours ago - ES050 0311 review form
2 days 15 hours ago - How can I request for my ATOS
2 days 15 hours ago - Tens of thousands lose their ESA as welfare reforms begin to bit
2 days 23 hours ago - DWP stays silent on DLA cuts advice from councils
2 days 23 hours ago - 7 year old & DLA
4 days 20 hours ago - Singular FOI request Islington ASG 2011/12 & more
5 days 12 hours ago - Hi.
I have a 7 and
6 days 12 hours ago


Government jargon should be taken more seriously, particularly as some people are missing out on benefits, MPs say.
A public administration select committee report said many pensioners did not claim benefits because of problems understanding forms.
It recommended that people encountering poorly written forms should be encouraged to make official complaints.
It suggested plain speaking should be praised more and impenetrable language "exposed and condemned".
The MPs said sketch writers "perform a public service by skewering the most egregious linguistic excesses".
In its report on its inquiry into political and administrative language, the committee said that in politics, badly worded explanations could stop people understanding how policies would work and "stock phrases" could be so overused they replaced original expression and thought.
Stock phrases
Euphemisms such as "downsizing" or "efficiency savings" are routinely used by politicians when they mean budget or staff cuts, the report said.
The committee heard about complaints over letters from government department, which included one from a Citizens Advice Bureau adviser who pointed out: "A four-page letter to ask for a medical certificate is not helpful."
The National Audit Office said departments had to be "more realistic about how people read and complete forms rather than making assumptions about how citizens should behave".
Its own investigation into pensioner poverty found that a major reason they did not apply for all their benefits was because of "difficulty in completing forms".
And HM Revenue and Customs estimated that mistakes made when people filled in self-assessment tax forms resulted in about £300m in underpaid tax every year.
The MPs' committee said poorly worded documents were a "significant concern, especially when large numbers of people are affected".
"Long, complex official forms, officious letters and confusing requests for information can all deter individuals from attempting to deal with public authorities," the report said.
"This is particularly worrying when it prevents people from getting the benefits or services to which they are entitled."
Maladministration
People should be encouraged to complain about particularly bad cases of official language - first to the department concerned, then to the relevant ombudsman, it added.
Poorly worded forms which stopped people understanding their rights amount to "maladministration", the committee said - which would provide grounds for a complaint to an ombudsman.
Committee chairman Tony Wright said: "Good government requires good language, while bad language is a sign of poor government. Far too often, government uses language that obscures, confuses or evades.
"We propose that cases of bad official language should be treated as 'maladministration', as for any other type of poor administration.
"Complaints made on this basis must be dealt with properly. This would help ensure that government takes seriously its responsibility to use good, clear and understandable language."
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/8385327.stm