Skip to main content

Local Government Finance Revenue Support Grant Settlement & Localism Bill

43 replies [Last post]
kevin
kevin's picture
Offline
Last seen: 51 weeks 1 day ago
Joined: 09/03/2009

kevin
kevin's picture
Offline
Last seen: 51 weeks 1 day ago
Joined: 09/03/2009
Local Authority Grants: Impact of Cuts — Debate - HOL

kevin
kevin's picture
Offline
Last seen: 51 weeks 1 day ago
Joined: 09/03/2009
Councils await funding cut as Localism Bill unveiled

Councils in England are to learn later how much the funding they receive from central government will be cut over the next two years.

Many are expecting a substantial reduction amid the spending review.

Ministers will also reveal their proposals to give groups in local communities greater scope to take over control of some services from councils.

They say the Localism Bill will lay the foundations for what David Cameron calls "the big society".

The bill also proposes a change in the role that councils play in finding accommodation for homeless families.

Instead of being obliged to house families who are eligible, councils would be able to discharge their responsibilities by finding them private rented accommodation for at least 12 months.

Tony Travers, from the London School of Economics, said the cuts would be the worst for local councils since 1945, affecting all services including social services for the elderly and children.

"There's been nothing like this in modern times," he told the BBC.

"If you look at, for example, Denis Healey's efforts in the late '70s to cut public spending, it had a one or two year impact on public expenditure - including on councils - but nothing like this.

"This is going to be for at least four years, and will reduce local government spending by 15% in real terms over that time."

He said councils estimated 140,000 jobs could go by the end of the process - but conceded that figure had been disputed by Communities Secretary Eric Pickles.

The minister said the bill would give local people power in three ways.

The first would involve them taking ownership of community buildings such as redundant pubs, redundant shops, redundant post offices and school buildings.

"Under existing legislation they can do that, we are just making it easier for them," he explained.

"The second thing that neighbourhoods can do is if they think they can run a local service better, they will have a right to be able to bid for that service.

"And the third thing is that we are going to introduce neighbourhood planning similar to what exists in Germany, so that neighbourhoods can determine the look and the shape of their communities, and once they've done that, providing a person wants to put something up in accordance with that plan, they won't require additional planning permission."

He added that although local authorities are to have a "tough" settlement he believed they were expecting it and would be able to manage by cutting costs, such as sharing services with neighbouring councils.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-11980367

kevin
kevin's picture
Offline
Last seen: 51 weeks 1 day ago
Joined: 09/03/2009
Localism Bill starts a new era of people power

A landmark bill that heralds a ground-breaking shift in power to councils and communities overturning decades of central government control was unveiled by Communities and Local Government Secretary Eric Pickles today.

The Localism Bill will put an end to the hoarding of power within central government and top-down control of communities, allowing local people the freedom to run their lives and neighbourhoods in their own way.

The Bill, laid before Parliament today, contains a radical package of reforms that will devolve greater power and freedoms to councils and neighbourhoods, establish powerful new rights for communities, revolutionise the planning system, and give communities control over housing decisions.

The legislation will help build the Big Society by radically transforming the relationships between central government, local government, communities and individuals.

For councils the Bill will fundamentally change their freedom to act in the interest of their local communities through a new general power of competence. Rather than needing to rely on specific powers, the new power will give councils the legal reassurance and confidence to innovate, drive down costs to deliver more efficient services.

Eric Pickles said:

"The Localism Bill will herald a ground-breaking shift in power to councils and communities overturning decades of central government control and starting a new era of people power.

"It is the centrepiece of what this Government is trying to do to fundamentally shake up the balance of power in this country. For too long, everything has been controlled from the centre - and look where it's got us. Central government has kept local government on a tight leash, strangling the life out of councils in the belief that bureaucrats know best.

"By getting out of the way and letting councils and communities run their own affairs we can restore civic pride, democratic accountability and economic growth - and build a stronger, fairer Britain. It's the end of the era of big government: laying the foundations for the Big Society."

The Localism Bill contains further measures to strengthen local democracy by:

  • Devolving significant new powers to councils - In a major transfer of power from Whitehall to town halls, councils will be freed from bureaucratic constraints with new freedoms and flexibilities to act in the best interests of their area. Councillors will have to approve and be required to publish new chief executive pay rules at full Council that management will have to follow. Councillors will no longer be prevented from voting on campaign issues; and there will be a new power to create directly elected mayors in 12 cities giving residents a say in a strong democratically elected leader;
  • Establishing powerful new rights for local people and communities - powers for councils are accompanied by greater powers for local people to hold their local authorities to account. Local people and communities' will have real power and a bigger say over their area through a new right to challenge to take over services; a new right to bid to buy local assets such as libraries, pubs and shops; the a new right to veto excessive council tax rises through a referendum. Bin tax laws repealed;
  • Radically reforming planning - Ministers believe the current planning system is too centralised and bureaucratic, too adversarial and remote from the communities it affects. The Bill will restore democratic and local control over planning by replacing the Infrastructure Planning Commission with an efficient and democratically accountable system for major infrastructure. The Bill will enable regional planning to be swept away and in its place neighbourhood plans will become the new building blocks of the planning system where communities have the power to grant planning permission if a local majority are in favour;
  • Making housing fairer and more democratic - The Bill will return decision-making powers on housing to local councils and communities through a new Community Right to Build giving communities the freedom they need in order to come together to build new homes & amenities in their towns & villages. Home Information Packs will be formally scrapped. The Bill will put councils in charge of allocation and tenure of social housing, giving councils the flexibility to use their social housing stock to the maximum effect and reduce waiting lists., It will be easier for social tenants to relocate though a new National Homeswap Scheme, and councils will be able to offer flexible solutions to people at risk of homelessness. The Housing Revenue Account Subsidy System will be replaced with a more transparent system that serves local communities. Tenants will be able to scrutinise the services offered by their landlords and hold them to account. The Tenant Services Authority will be abolished but its vital economic regulation functions will be preserved.
  • Creating powerful incentives for economic growth - The Bill will give local government a stronger financial stake in the local economy, helping rebalance the economy, so it is more entrepreneurial and attracts local business by allowing local authorities to grant discretionary business rate discounts; making small business tax breaks easier take advantage of; giving affected businesses a greater say in rate supplements and cancelling certain backdated business rates including port taxes;

Decentralisation Minister Greg Clark said:

"This Bill will provide the enduring legislative foundation for a new, decentralised Britain, where power is returned to the people to which it belongs. We believe that communities should have the freedom to manage their own affairs in their way, and be empowered, not suppressed, by Government. The Bill will enact new rights allowing local people to shape and influence the places where they live, revolutionising the planning process by passing power down to those who know best about their neighbourhoods."

Housing Minister Grant Shapps added:

"With housebuilding at its lowest peacetime level since 1924, the time is right for radical shake up of the entire system. The Bill will end top-down targets - in their place communities with the vision and drive to build more homes will be given the freedom to achieve their ambitions, and this will be backed up with powerful cash incentives for councils that allow new development in their area.

"With five million people languishing on social housing waiting lists, social housing is ripe for reform. Councils will now be able to manage social housing in a way that genuinely meets the needs of local people, and will be able to offer fixed tenancies that give people the helping hand they need, for as long as they need it."

Communities Minister, Andrew Stunell said:

"The Localism Bill will pave the way for the long overdue push of powers out of Whitehall to councils and neighbourhoods across the country, and give local communities real control over housing and planning decisions.

"Local facilities have been closing down all over the country, leaving towns and villages without vital services.

"Small community groups that are willing to take over local assets often find that they lack the time and resources to get a plan together and compete with the might and muscle of big business and developers.

"The powerful new rights in the Bill will put real power in the hands of real people, empowering local communities and putting them at the heart of local decision making."

Notes to editors

1. Ministers have already started giving councils greater financial freedom, by devolving and streamlining £7 billion more of government funding, removing burdens and bureaucratic controls so that they can prioritise budgets to support public services in ways which meet the priorities of local people and communities, helping to manage demand on services so they are more personalised and effective for vulnerable groups thereby reducing costs to society.

2. The Government also wants to create a new era of accountability and openness where bureaucratic accountability is replaced by democratic accountability. Putting more data in the public domain is central in making this happen and will drive smarter spending.

3. Getting council business out in the open will revolutionise local government and help facilitate the Big Society. Councils are now expected to publish all expenditure over £500 online. Local people should be able to hold their council to account. Greater openness and transparency is absolutely critical to root out waste and inefficiency.

4. General Power of Competence: Local Authorities are creatures of statute - they only have the power to do what Parliament has authorised them to do - unlike a natural person that can do anything except where that power to act is curtailed by law. Since local authorities were first incorporated power has been given to them on a piecemeal basis. Now, with GPC, local authorities can basically act in that same way as a natural person, except where restricted by statute such as creating a new tax.

5. The Government has today also published Decentralisation and the Localism Bill: an essential guide. Its sets out six actions central government will need to take to achieve and maintain the radical shift in power, - in behaviour, expectation, and culture - which must go alongside the changes in law proposed in the Bill. The guide to can be found at: www.communities.gov.uk/decentralisationguide.

http://www.communities.gov.uk/news/localgovernment/1794971

kevin
kevin's picture
Offline
Last seen: 51 weeks 1 day ago
Joined: 09/03/2009
The Localism Bill

The Localism Bill was introduced to Parliament on 13 December 2010.

This Bill will shift power from central government back into the hands of individuals, communities and councils.

We are committed to this because over time central government has become too big, too interfering, too controlling and too bureaucratic. This has undermined local democracy and individual responsibility, and stifled innovation and enterprise within public services.

We want to see a radical shift in the balance of power and to decentralise power as far as possible. Localism isn't simply about giving power back to local government. This Government trusts people to take charge of their lives and we will push power downwards and outwards to the lowest possible level, including individuals, neighbourhoods, professionals and communities as well as local councils and other local institutions.

  • for services which are used individually, this means putting power in the hands of individuals themselves
  • where services are enjoyed collectively, they should be delivered by accountable community groups
  • where the scale is too large or those using a service are too dispersed, they should be delivered by local institutions, subject
    to democratic checks and balances, enabled by full transparency.

The Localism Bill includes a number of important packages:

  • decentralisation and strengthening local democracy
  • Non-Domestic Rates
  • community empowerment
  • a radical re-boot of the planning system including neighbourhood planning
  • changes to social housing policies
  • devolving power to London boroughs.

The measures in the Bill exemplify and take forward the six actions of decentralisation that underpin the Government's approach to decentralisation. See Decentralisation and the Localism Bill: an essential guide for further background (available for download below).

Related publications

http://www.communities.gov.uk/localgovernment/decentralisation/localismb...

http://www.communities.gov.uk/statements/corporate/finance201113

kevin
kevin's picture
Offline
Last seen: 51 weeks 1 day ago
Joined: 09/03/2009
Residents and employees given chance to run social work

Social work services could be taken over by residents' groups or council employees under the Localism Bill published by the government today.

The legislation proposes "ending public sector monopolies" to improve services, and giving "every citizen the power to change the services provided to them through participation, choice or the ballot box".

The bill – which is being seen as crucial to implement the government's Big Society agenda – would enable community groups, charities and public sector employees given a new right to challenge councils by expressing an interest in running any of their services. Such a move could trigger a procurement process into which other bodies could enter.

The move would apply to social work services, a Department for Communities and Local government spokesman confirmed.

A guide to the bill published by the department stated: "Our default position is that all public services should be open to diverse provision, with monopoly provision justified on an exceptional basis."

Deputy prime minister Nick Clegg said the bill "marks the beginning of a power shift away from central government to the people, families and communities of Britain".

"The power shift we want will not happen overnight," he added. "We will face opposition from those with a vested interest in the status quo. But we know that dispersing power is the way to improve our public services and get the better schools and safer hospitals we want."

Communities secretary Eric Pickles said the bill would herald a "new era of people power".

"It's the end of the era of big government: laying the foundations for the Big Society," he said.

Stephen Bubb, chief executive of the Association of Chief Executives of Voluntary Organisations (ACEVO), said on his blog that the bill offered "huge opportunities" for charities, social enterprises and community groups.

But he warned that the bill was being introduced against a background of cuts. "So we need to be savvy. If the council has not been able to develop a sustainable business model for running assets we need to be crystal clear our business model will do so," he said.

Trade union Unite described the bill as a "smokescreen" for cuts.

"This new 'localism' is a façade hiding job losses, cuts for services to families and children,  and funding inequalities," said general secretary elect Len McCluskey. "Under the coalition's new funding formula, wealthy Tory areas, such as Tunbridge Wells, will receive large increases and deprived areas, such as Liverpool and Sunderland, will see a swingeing cut in their grant."

The bill also promised to end the capping of council tax by central government, with local referenda being used to decide whether large council tax increases should be allowed to proceed.

Councils would also have to reveal their chief officers' pay and detail every item of expenditure in excess of £500.

Residents will be able to petition to hold a local referendum on any issue and referendums will be held to see if the 12 largest English cities are to have directly elected mayors.

The Localism Bill would also relax councils' homelessness duties by enabling them to place people accepted as homeless in private rented accommodation against their will, so long as the tenancy was for at least a year.

Currently, people can request to be placed in social housing, and the policy is designed to free up social housing for other tenants and prevent homeless people from spending long periods of time in temporary accommodation awaiting a social home.

http://www.communitycare.co.uk/Articles/2010/12/13/116001/localism-bill-...

kevin
kevin's picture
Offline
Last seen: 51 weeks 1 day ago
Joined: 09/03/2009
Government heeds London’s call for more devolved powers

The drive to give London boroughs and their residents greater freedom to develop tailor-made solutions to local challenges has been backed by London Councils.

A host of the proposals in the Localism Bill, published today (Monday) echo the calls made by the capital’s local authorities to the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government Eric Pickles.

These include devolving powers for making crucial decisions from quangos and central government to local councils and the Mayor, the consolidation of mayoral strategies, and giving boroughs more control over major planning decisions affecting their local communities.

Boroughs and the Mayor have already agreed ways of working together which accord with the government’s devolutionary aims. Now London Councils is urging the government to ensure that none of its proposals present any obstacles to these joint agreements being put into practice. .

Chair of London Councils, Mayor Jules Pipe, said:

"London’s local government has a history of demonstrating its ambition and capacity for taking on new powers to help improve the quality of life for their residents.

“While continuing to argue for that devolution to go further, we will take these proposals forward positively with the Mayor and our own local communities to ensure   we secure the best possible outcome for Londoners."


Notes to editors

Find information on the government’s Localism Bill at the Parliament website Opens in a new window

The joint letter from London Councils, the Mayor of London, and the London Assembly to Eric Pickles, Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government, making a united case for further devolution to London from central government can be seen here.

kevin
kevin's picture
Offline
Last seen: 51 weeks 1 day ago
Joined: 09/03/2009
Crunch time for Big Society - NCVO

Yesterday's Localism Bill included proposals for empowering local people, freeing local government from central and regional control and giving local communities a real share in local growth.

This includes powers to delay the sale of local assets to allow community groups time to get a bid together to buy them (Community Right to Buy).  Community or voluntary sector groups, as well as parish councils and council employees delivering the service, will also get new powers to challenge and take over a local service (Community Right to Challenge).

Sir Stuart Etherington, our Chief Executive, said:

"The Community Rights measures are a welcome step towards giving people a greater say in how things are run at local level.  Community assets, both buildings and land, can play a key role in strengthening communities, as a focus for community life and a resource to support local enterprise.

"The local government settlement announced today is another important piece of the jigsaw for the voluntary and community sector, and the decisions to be made over funding in the coming months will be one of the most significant steps in determining the success or failure of Big Society.  Councils must avoid seeing the voluntary and community sector as a soft target, as vulnerable and disadvantaged groups stand to lose the most if vital services are cut.

"Being able to weather the difficult times ahead will depend on good relationships all round, and we hope that the Bill will promote closer partnerships between local government and communities. However, the appropriate mechanisms will need to be in place for those occasions when these relationships don’t work out, starting with local compacts, and bringing in the Local Government Ombudsman where necessary."

For more information on community powers and asset transfer, please visit our Big Society Evidence pages.

http://www.ncvo-vol.org.uk/news/civil-society/crunch-time-big-society

kevin
kevin's picture
Offline
Last seen: 51 weeks 1 day ago
Joined: 09/03/2009
Localism Bill Offers Powers to Local Communities

New legislation announced today will shift power from central government to local councils and communities.

The Localism Bill, unveiled by Communities and Local Government Secretary Eric Pickles, contains a package of measures designed to devolve power to communities, giving them more control over their decisions such as planning and housing.

It is also hoped the bill will support the Big Society by impacting on the relationships between central and local government, communities and individuals.

The Bill includes plans to:

  • Devolve significant powers to councils.
  • Establish new rights for local people and communities.
  • Reform the planning system.
  • Make housing fairer and more democratic.
  • Establish powerful incentives for economic growth.

Mr Pickles said:

“The Localism Bill will herald a ground-breaking shift in power to councils and communities overturning decades of central government control and starting a new era of people power.

“By getting out of the way and letting councils and communities run their own affairs we can restore civic pride, democratic accountability and economic growth – and build a stronger, fairer Britain. It’s the end of an era for big government: laying the foundations for the Big Society.”

For further details please click here (opens in new window).

http://www.fundingcentral.org.uk/newsview.aspx?RF=NEWS&WCU=DSCODE%3dOTSS...

http://www.communities.gov.uk/localgovernment/decentralisation/localismb...

kevin
kevin's picture
Offline
Last seen: 51 weeks 1 day ago
Joined: 09/03/2009
The Social Investment Business responds to the Localism Bill

Commenting on the publication of the Localism Bill by the Department for Communities and Local Government today, The Social Investment Business Chief Executive Jonathan Lewis said:

“This Bill will remove barriers and give local authorities greater opportunity to commission services from local voluntary groups, charities and social enterprises.

“Civil society organisations, working hard in their communities, are really good at both designing and delivering services that are tailored to local people’s needs and can be realised within tight budgets.

“We’ve helped community organisations to run local libraries, swimming pools and take over pubs as well as hundreds of others who have won contracts from their councils to provide services like special needs education, residential care for the elderly and training for the long term unemployed.

“We know there is great appetite in the sector to do more. But only if the right kind of support is available to civil society organisations – both investment and advice – will we really see a transformation in the way we ‘do’ public services in this country.”

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

1. For further information or interviews, please contact The Social Investment Business press office:

Liz Banks - 0207 842 7726/ 07809 504072  liz.banks@socialinvestmentbusiness.org

Nicola Jones - 0207 842 7755 nicola.jones@socialinvestmentbusiness.org

2. The Social Investment Business, the fastest growing social investor in the UK, exists to help social enterprises, charities and community organisations do more of what they do best – supporting people and communities most in need. We help organisations prosper by providing innovative financial solutions, business support and long term strategic thinking.

www.thesocialinvestmentbusiness.org @TheSocialInvest

3. The Social Investment Business manages Government funds on behalf of the Office for Civil Society, the Department of Health and the Department for Communities and Local Government, with over 1,000 active investments. These range from £3,600 to help a small organisation bid successfully for a public sector contract, to £6.7million to help a large national charity establish and develop innovative new services for children and young people.

http://www.thesocialinvestmentbusiness.org/category/news/2010/the-social...

kevin
kevin's picture
Offline
Last seen: 51 weeks 1 day ago
Joined: 09/03/2009
Committee to hold fifth evidence session for Localism inquiry

The Commons Communities and Local Government Committee will hold an oral evidence session on Monday 20 December on Localism.

The Committee announced an inquiry into the Government’s plans for localism and decentralisation of public services on 28 July 2010. This is the fifth evidence session in the series.

Witnesses

4.20 pm

  • David Congdon, Head of Policy & Campaigns, Mencap
  • Vic Rayner, Chief Executive, Sitra
  • Gemma Bradshaw, Policy Advisor, Communities & Transport, Age UK
  • Dr Rob Berkeley, Director, The Runnymede Trust

5.00 pm

  • Eugene Sullivan, Chief Executive and Peter Wilkinson, Managing Director for Policy, Research & Studies, Audit Commission
  • Steve Freer, Chief Executive, CIPFA
  • Jessica Crowe, Executive Director, Centre for Public Scrutiny

Grimond Room, Portcullis House

http://www.parliament.uk/business/committees/committees-a-z/commons-sele...

kevin
kevin's picture
Offline
Last seen: 51 weeks 1 day ago
Joined: 09/03/2009
Localism: how far can it go?

The government's push towards localism can only succeed if everyone – including Whitehall departments – understands exactly what it means, says Anna Turley

How Local is Localism was the title of a seminar organised by progressive Conservative think-tank Bright Blue recently. This title articulates perfectly a crucial conundrum that threatens the coherence and effectiveness of this government's domestic policy and political agenda. Namely, how far do we devolve and what or who do we mean when we use the term localism?

The Decentralisation and Localism Bill sets out a devolutionary agenda that aims to embed localism at the heart of policy-making and public service delivery. The bill seeks to devolve power down to the lowest level, sends out a signal to empower local government through the General Power of Competence, and puts people in greater control of their local area.

The impetus and direction of travel are to be welcomed. The Localism Bill could symbolise a defining feature of democratic renewal and potentially lead to more effective public services.

However, these individual reforms, when set against one another and alongside the government's radical public service reform agenda, are not always comfortable in each other's company. At present there are different – at times competing – interpretations of decentralisation and localism across Whitehall.

Inconsistencies are emerging, with radical reforms across other government departments unfolding at pace with varying degrees and interpretations of decentralisation and localism. For example, at the Department for Work and Pensions, the Work Programme was commissioned on a regional basis, when other regional architecture such as RDAs and government offices have been ripped out on the basis that regions are not suitable economic geographies.

The question then is: what does Whitehall as a whole understand as localism and how committed is it to achieving it? The limited scale of community-based budgets suggests there is little coherence about what localism and devolution means, and what the right spatial tiers are to which to devolve appropriate decision-making.

This agenda is of course fighting the innate desire of Whitehall to protect its own control and fear of local difference. Judging by history, the danger is that localism will end up only applying to those policies that the Department for Communities and Local Government (CLG) has unique control over, such as planning and housing.

A ministerial team which is championing localism across government has been setting out decrees on everything from how regularly the bins should be collected, to when the flag of St George should fly above town halls

How often have we seen great devolutionary approaches run into the sand across Whitehall?

The second kind of inconsistency lies in CLG itself and can best be characterised as "any kind of localism as long as it's mine". There has been widespread frustration that a ministerial team which is championing localism across government has been setting out decrees on everything from how regularly the bins should be collected, to when the flag of St George should fly above town halls. And set against a backdrop of unprecedented and heavily front-loaded cuts, the lauding of greater freedom at local level is leaving a bitter taste in the mouth for many.

The third issue is confusion as to the right geographical and spatial level to devolve decision-making. The rapid dismantling of state architecture has left huge voids in the strategic development and delivery of key functions. The bottom-up approach to local enterprise partnerships left parts of the country with no regional, sub-regional or pan-local collaborative representation which is crucial in driving local economic development and regeneration across local authority boundaries. At the moment there is a lack of clarity over whether some powers get devolved down to local authorities or drawn back up to Whitehall. Similarly, it is unclear whether the duty to cooperate between authorities will be sufficient to ensure strategic planning is undertaken, potentially leaving a vacuum between the power of individual citizens and neighbourhoods and central government. On planning there seems little strategic power between the new hyper-local neighbourhood plans set out in the bill, and central government.

The government's intention of making public services more accountable to local people and less upwards to Whitehall is laudable. However, the fragmentation of local public service delivery that could result from policies such as free schools, elected police commissioners and GP commissioning could weaken the influence of representative democracy at the local level, undermine the role of councillors as civic leaders and limit the scope of financial savings through service integration.

While there can be no doubt that greater localism through the empowerment of individuals and neighbourhoods is vital to improving our local places, there is a danger that the state, including local government, is seen as a barrier to localism and the Big Society, rather than an enabler. Local democracy is far from perfect, but rather than circumventing it, this new localist drive should put renewed and reinvigorated local government at the heart of it.

Anna Turley is deputy director at the New Local Government Network

http://www.publicservice.co.uk/feature_story.asp?id=15464

kevin
kevin's picture
Offline
Last seen: 51 weeks 1 day ago
Joined: 09/03/2009
Briefing on the Decentralisation and Localism Bill (NCVO)

kevin
kevin's picture
Offline
Last seen: 51 weeks 1 day ago
Joined: 09/03/2009
A plain English guide to the Localism Bill

Summary

This guide describes the main measures of the Localism Bill under four headings:

  • new freedoms and flexibilities for local government
  • new rights and powers for communities and individuals
  • reform to make the planning system more democratic and more effective
  • reform to ensure that decisions about housing are taken locally

This document is designed to give an overview only. You can read the Bill and its explanatory notes in full, and follow its progress through parliament, on the parliament website (external link).

The document Decentralisation and the Localism Bill: an essential guide also gives further background. It explains how the principles that underpin the Localism Bill also inform other government policies.

Order

  • This publication is only available online - see below to download.

Download

kevin
kevin's picture
Offline
Last seen: 51 weeks 1 day ago
Joined: 09/03/2009
Public Service reform

Prime Minister David Cameron has set out the Government’s ambitious plans for modernising public services, driven by competition, choice and greater independence for institutions.

In a speech at the RSA in London, the PM said 2011 was a critical year for the Government’s modernisation agenda.

Mr Cameron stressed he wanted “one of the great legacies of this Government to be the complete modernisation of our public services.”

The PM said he was “incredibly optimistic about what the country can achieve” this year, and that modernisation is both a personal and political priority for him.

Mr Cameron said:

“I don’t want anyone to doubt how important this is to me.

“My passion about this is both personal and political. Personal because I’ve experienced, first-hand, how dedicated, how professional, how compassionate our best public servants are.

“And this is a political passion – and priority – of mine too. I believe that Britain can be one of the great success stories of the new decade.”

The PM hailed work already underway to modernise services by announcing that more than 140 GP-led consortia have now come forward, covering over half the country.

These consortia are using new powers to take control of NHS budgets and directly commission services for their patients.

Speeches and transcripts: PM’s speech on public service reform

http://www.number10.gov.uk/news/topstorynews/2011/01/public-service-refo...

kevin
kevin's picture
Offline
Last seen: 51 weeks 1 day ago
Joined: 09/03/2009
Localism Bill to hand power to the people gains support

An historic bill to return power to councils and communities reversing decades of increasing central government control was given new backing today.

The Localism Bill will mark a revolution in the way the country works by putting power back into the hands of the people through a radical package of reforms and new freedoms.

A wide range of organisations, from civic and community groups and business leaders to housing and planning professionals and local authorities, have thrown their weight behind the Bill as it starts its second reading in Parliament today.

To make sure the general public and community groups can fully understand the effects of the Bill, a plain English guide has also been published today.

The guide seeks to translate complex legal language used in the 207 clause Bill in a transparent and reader friendly way, so anyone can understand how the Bill will devolve greater power and freedoms to councils and neighbourhoods, establish powerful new rights for communities, revolutionise the planning system, and give communities control over housing decisions.

Local Government and Communities Secretary Eric Pickles said:

"The Localism Bill is one of the most radical pieces of legislation to be debated in this chamber for decades. It is a triumph for democracy over bureaucracy.

"It will fundamentally shake up the balance of power in this country. It represents everything this Government stands for and is the cornerstone for everything we want to do. It will revitalise local democracy and put power back where it belongs - in the hands of the people.

"For too long, Government has believed that Whitehall was the centre of the universe. We genuinely believe in local democracy, in local communities, and in local solutions.

"This Bill will give councils the power and the authority they need to make sensible decisions for the area - a shot in the arm for local democracy - and it will give people new rights, new powers, new opportunities to act on the issues that matter to them.

"By pushing power out, getting Government out of the way, letting people run their own affairs; we can build a stronger, fairer Britain."

Decentralisation Minster Greg Clark added:

"This Bill represents nothing less than a reshaping of the constitutional settlement - a new page in the relationship between the people and government. It is based on belief in the ingenuity of local leaders, pride in the strength of local democracy and respect for people's common sense. It will give free rein to the ambitions and commitment of all the people who want to play their part in making their neighbourhood a better place to live."

Tony Burton, Director of Civic Voice said:

"The fundamental 'power shift' to local communities intended by the Localism Bill will be applauded by civic societies and other community groups whose skills, knowledge and expertise have been undervalued for too long. With the right safeguards and support Civic Voice relishes the opportunities being provided for communities to take the lead in planning and shaping the future of the places where we all live."

Liz Peace, Chief Executive of the British Property Federation added:

"There has been a lot of hysterical comment on the impact of the localism agenda on the property industry. The Bill has gone some way to countering this and whilst there is still much that remains to be resolved we are re-assured by the emphasis that the Government is now placing on growth and the way in which localism is to be used as the vehicle for encouraging communities to opt, not for nimbyism, but for the sustainable development of both the homes and commercial property that our economy so desperately needs."

Sarah Webb, Chief Executive of Chartered Institute of Housing said:

"The Localism Bill will bring in some major changes for the housing sector and its tenants. The extra flexibility being offered around approaches to housing and planning within local communities is timely recognition of the expertise and professionalism in the housing sector. Aspects of the Bill will help improve housing professionals' capacity to develop tailored and effective local solutions to challenging housing problems, and we look forward to working with Parliamentarians to finesse the Bill at and beyond its second reading."

Cllr Michael Chater, chairman of the National Association of Local Councils said:

"We welcome the positive ambitions of the Localism Bill to drive power and decision making down to communities. Local (community, neighbourhood, parish and town community) councils will be greatly encouraged by their enhanced recognition and the opportunities to serve local people through greater influence in planning, housing, social and economic regeneration and community well being."

Notes to editors

1. The Localism Bill has been published at: http://services.parliament.uk/bills/2010-11/localism.html (external link).

2. The Plain English guide to the Localism Bill can be found at: www.communities.gov.uk/publications/localgovernment/localismplainenglishguide.

3. Additional quotes:

Kate Henderson, Chief Executive of the Town and Country Planning Association said:

"Localism is an opportunity to be grasped. The drive towards community based planning is a long standing TCPA objective and we welcome the determination to reconnect the system to the people it serves. We must seek to shape a planning system which is responsive to people's needs and aspirations and promotes sustainable development."

Chris Wade, Chief Executive of Action for Market Towns said:

"This welcome Bill is a huge step forward in the drive to put greater decision making powers and more funding decisions in the hands of local people. We have long championed community-led planning in its broadest sense and our experience shows that with determination and a little guidance communities are ready to take control. The Bill will give more weight to communities' carefully informed views on issues that affect them and the services they use."

ResPublica Deputy Director Ash Singh said:

"The Localism Bill puts people and communities in control. Social enterprises and civil society organisations can articulate the problems in a given community - as well the solutions to those problems - far more effectively than the Man in Whitehall and the Government gets this. The new community rights to buy, to bid, to build and to know, and the commitments to enable more civil society organisations to deliver public services should help to reverse decades of centralisation and inefficiency."

http://www.communities.gov.uk/news/corporate/1818838

kevin
kevin's picture
Offline
Last seen: 51 weeks 1 day ago
Joined: 09/03/2009
Second reading of Localism Bill, now have your say

Home Secretary Eric Pickles introduced the second reading of the Localism Bill in the House of Commons on Monday 17 January.

The Bill passed with a vote and will now be considered by a Public Bill Committee. Watch and read the views expressed by MPs who took part in the House of Commons debate.

Have your say

The Bill has now been sent to a Public Bill Committee for scrutiny and there is a call for written evidence.

Do you have relevant expertise and experience or a special interest in the Government’s Localism Bill?

If so, you can submit your views in writing to the House of Commons Public Bill Committee which is going to consider this Bill. 

Guidance for submitting written evidence

Summary of this Bill

The Localism Bill will devolve greater powers to councils and neighbourhoods and give local communities more control over housing and planning decisions.

Key areas of the Bill

  • Provisions in relation to local government, including a general power of competence for local authorities and relevant Fire and Rescue Authorities, changes to local authority governance arrangements  including provision for directly elected mayors, the abolition of the Standards Board regime, and requirements for  local authorities to set senior pay policy statements.
  • Provisions  relating to community empowerment, including  giving people, councillors and councils the power to instigate local referendums on any local issue and a power to approve or veto in a referendum a council tax increase deemed to be excessive, and enabling voluntary and community bodies and others to express an interest in running a local authority service, and local community groups to bid or buy buildings or land which are listed as assets of community value.
  • Reform of the planning system; including provisions to abolish regional strategies, provide for neighbourhood development orders and plans, make pre-application consultation compulsory, and make changes to planning enforcement.
  • Provisions to reform social housing including measures to offer flexible tenancies for new social tenants; create a new system of council housing finance; provide assistance for tenants to exchange their social rented property; and transfer the functions of the Tenant Service Authority to the Homes and Communities Agency.
  • Abolition of the Home Information Pack.
  • Provisions for London that provide the Mayor with additional powers relating to housing and regeneration.
  • Abolition of the London Development Agency.

http://www.parliament.uk/business/news/2011/january/localism-bill-second...

kevin
kevin's picture
Offline
Last seen: 51 weeks 1 day ago
Joined: 09/03/2009
Localism Bill - HOC debate

kevin
kevin's picture
Offline
Last seen: 51 weeks 1 day ago
Joined: 09/03/2009
Localism Bill - London Councils

The Localism Bill which proposes to give London boroughs and their residents greater freedom to develop tailor-made solutions to local challenges, reaches its second reading at the House of Commons on 17 January. The Bill will have wide-ranging impact on housing and planning policy in particular.

London Councils will be producing a series of briefings and has prepared one specifically for the second reading. Download the 2nd reading briefing here Opens in a new window, or below.


London Councils orignal briefing on the provisions in the Localism Bill is available below. The first briefing sets out the main elements of the Bill, paying particular attention to those areas that specifically affect London.

Follow the progress of the Bill on the Parliament website

Following the second reading on 17 January, the Bill will pass to Committee stage, Report stage and Third reading before progressing to the House of Lords.

related documents

http://www.londoncouncils.gov.uk/policylobbying/londonmatters/devolution...

kevin
kevin's picture
Offline
Last seen: 51 weeks 1 day ago
Joined: 09/03/2009
Provisional Local Government Finance Settlement, 2011-12 to 2012

Provisional Local Government Finance Settlement, 2011-12 to 2012-13 - Capital finance briefing - London Councils

This briefing on capital finance complements our previous briefings on the Local Government Finance Settlement and on the Education Settlement. It covers aspects of the Local Government Finance Settlement relating to capital finance.

related documents

Provisional Local Government Finance Settlement - Capital finance briefing (PDF, 135Kb)

http://www.londoncouncils.gov.uk/policylobbying/localgovernmentfinance/c...

kevin
kevin's picture
Offline
Last seen: 51 weeks 1 day ago
Joined: 09/03/2009
Localism Bill ''could cost councils £1bn''

The Localism Bill must be changed or councils could be fined more than £1bn by the European Union (EU), the Local Government Association (LGA) has claimed.

The LGA is concerned about plans to make local authorities pay EU fines when targets on air quality and recycling rates are not met nationally. But with the current wave of cuts, councils will have to raise council taxes or cut more services – worse still, the problem could happen very soon because the government is already exceeding air pollution targets and could be fined £300m. Other EU directives could take this figure to £1bn, claimed LGA chair Baroness Margaret Eaton.

"The potentially billion pound fines from Brussels are for breaching national targets, which were agreed by central government with the EU," Eaton said. "Changing the goalposts now to make councils liable for fines is unfair to them and unfair to the local residents who may have to foot the bill. The government must amend this unfair, unworkable, dangerous and unconstitutional legislation."

She added: "At the moment too many of the factors which could lead the UK to miss [its] targets fall outside town hall influence. On air quality alone big polluters like motorways and bus operators are currently beyond our control. Councils can do good work locally, but making them liable for fines for failing to fix a problem they don't have sufficient powers or money to fully address is demonstrably unfair."

http://www.publicservice.co.uk/news_story.asp?id=15225

kevin
kevin's picture
Offline
Last seen: 51 weeks 1 day ago
Joined: 09/03/2009
We need a better dialogue

The public sector must tackle cuts in a way that appreciates what changes must take place in order for services to succeed – it is no longer good enough to provide the monolithic service structures of old. Joel Shenton reports from the recent Public Servant annual conference

The devolution of powers to the citizen and the community from what had become one of the world's most centralist states is underscored throughout the coalition's commitment to open up government and services. But there appears a serious flaw in the process.

A different kind of relationship, new engagement, was essential between the state, services and the people – it required a national conversation, "and the government has failed on this," Ben Lucas, director of the 2020 Public Services Trust, told the Public Servant conference session Putting the Customer First, sponsored by Digital Outreach.

"The coalition has already failed on citizens being involved in the discussion about the future for our public services." He challenged local government to step up, in the short time available, to involve people in determining a way forward.

"Even if current spending could be maintained, it would not necessarily produce the outcome that would be desirable for us as a society anyway," said Lucas. "The truth is that we've changed enormously as citizens and in many ways public services haven't kept up with those changes."

Describing the more consumerist view of public services in the 1980s and 1990s as "fairly inadequate", Lucas discouraged the term "customer" when talking about service users.

"For me the priority should be about citizenship, not just a consumer relationship, because public services are not straightforwardly a market commodity," he said. "They're something which as citizens we co-produce. We shape them through democratic deliberation.

"The value that comes from those services comes very often from the quality of the interaction between the citizen and the service. If, for example, in health you aren't able to influence people's behaviour in public health, then it doesn't matter how good the institutional form of that service is, that is not going to achieve the type of outcome that is required."

Key to getting value from services, Lucas said, was the concept of "social citizenship", an improved dialogue between citizens and the institutions that served them.

"The emphasis in reform should be on how you can unlock citizen and social potential to be more involved in the creation of services and also how you can reform state and public services so they can have a better relationship with citizens," he said. "To some extent the Big Society takes on much of this, but it puts insufficient emphasis on the role of the state in creating social productivity and the relationship between the citizen and the services."

He said that apart from public sector staff being asked to email their suggestions to government, there had not been anything like a national conversation.

In summary, Lucas said that the public sector must tackle cuts in a way that appreciated what changes must take place in order for services to succeed. It was no longer good enough to provide the monolithic service structures of old.

"There's some big and interesting challenges there, but they've got to start from a very different conception of the relationship between the citizen, the locality and the state," he said, "and all of those elements have got to change to achieve a better settlement."

There was a need to ensure better quality interaction between service and citizen, agreed Jude Palmer of Digital Outreach, and to ensure that services (digital by default) were still accessible to the digitally excluded. The voluntary and community sector was uniquely placed to support this.

IPPR director Nick Pearce emphasised the importance of building democratic accountability. No one had blinked at the abolition of regional development agencies. City region mayors would begin to turn the democratic tide, but even London's elected mayor could raise only 7 per cent of his own revenue.

He described services already evolving, particularly through transparency and accountability. Very little information was in the public domain in the post-war years. It started to change with league tables – performance measures mandated by central government.

An open data environment was crucial to citizen choice. Following the death of an IPPR intern in a cycling accident, he said Transport for London released statistics on the capital's road deaths, and the cycling community latched on to the data very quickly.

"Within a matter of hours, a new website was put up," said Pearce. "Some geek in Shoreditch basically took the data and turned it into a Google map of London and where the cycling deaths happened." The website revealed the accident location as a black spot and would almost certainly have changed the intern's route to work had it been known.

"The issue is not necessarily that it benefits the individual using a service, but it does benefit a community," he said.

http://www.publicservice.co.uk/feature_story.asp?id=15596

kevin
kevin's picture
Offline
Last seen: 51 weeks 1 day ago
Joined: 09/03/2009
MPs question ministers on impact of Localism Bill

In the fifth session of oral evidence for its inquiry examining localism, the Communities and Local Government Committee will be asking a range of questions about measures proposed within the Localism Bill including the new General Power of Competence.

The committee will be asking ministers from Home Office and from the Department for Work and Pensions to describe the steps underway in their own departments to promote the kind of decentralisation of decision-making and service design anticipated by the Bill. 

Witnesses

Location: Wilson Room, Portcullis House

4.20 pm

  • Baroness Eaton DBE DL, Chair, Local Government Association
  • Simon Parker, Director, New Local Government Network

5.10 pm

  • Rt Hon Nick Herbert MP, Minister of State for Policing and Criminal Justice
  • Rt Hon Chris Grayling MP, Minister of State for Employment, Department for Work and Pensions

http://www.parliament.uk/business/committees/committees-a-z/commons-sele...

kevin
kevin's picture
Offline
Last seen: 51 weeks 1 day ago
Joined: 09/03/2009
Localism Bill Committee announce programme

The Localism Bill Committee will hear oral evidence on Tuesday 25 and Thursday 27 January.

The Committee will then consider the Bill every Tuesday and Thursday from that point concluding on Thursday 10 March (apart from the week beginning 21 February when the House of Commons will not be sitting).

Programme and witnesses

Tuesday 25 January

in the Boothroyd Room, Portcullis House

at 9.30am

  • Local Government Association, Localis, Centre for Local Economic Strategies and Local Government Information Unit

at 11.00am

  • Civic Voice, Cllr Keith Barrow of Shropshire Council, Cllr Mike Jones of Cheshire West and Chester Council

at 11.30am

  • SOLACE, New Local Government Network, Professor George Jones, Emeritus Professor of Government at the London School of Economics, Professor John Stewart, Emeritus Professor of Local Government and Administration at the University Birmingham

at 12.15pm

  • Greater London Authority, London Councils and Unison

at 4.00pm

  • Chartered Institute for Housing, Shelter, National Housing Federation, Brent Private Tenants Rights Group and Tenant Services Authority

at 5.00pm

  • Barratt Developments, Redrow, Taylor Wimpey and Emerson Group

at 6.00pm

  • Homebuilders Federation, British Property Federation, National Federation of ALMOs and British Land

Thursday 27 January

in the Boothroyd Room, Portcullis House

at 9.00am

  • Confederation of British Industry, British Chambers of Commerce and Federation of Small Businesses

at 10.25am

  • Campaign to Protect Rural England, The Country Land and Business Association, Action with Communities in Rural England, Simon Marsh representing both the RSPB and Wildlife and Countryside Link

at 1.25pm

  • Town and Country Planning Association, Planning Officers Society and Royal Town Planning Institute and Royal Institute of Chartered Surveyors

at 2.00pm

  • National Association of Local Councils, National Council for Voluntary Organisations, Association of Chief Executives of Voluntary Organisations, National Association for Voluntary and Community Action and Open Spaces Society

at 2.45pm

  • Department for Communities and Local Government

Line by line scrutiny of the Bill

Committee Room 12, Palace of Westminster

Tuesday 1 February 10.30am and 4.00pm
Thursday 3 February 9.00am and 1.00pm
Tuesday 8 February 10.30am and 4.00pm
Thursday 10 February 9.00am and 1.00pm
Tuesday 15 February 10.30am and 4.00pm
Thursday 17 February 9.00am and 1.00pm
Tuesday 1 March 10.30am and 4.00pm
Thursday 3 March 9.00am and 1.00pm
Tuesday 8 March 10.30am and 4.00pm
Thursday 10 March 9.30am and 1.00pm

The Committee must complete consideration of the Bill no later than 4pm on Thursday 10 March.

These sessions will be open to the public on a first come, first served basis. There is no system for the prior reservation of seats in Committee Rooms.

It is advisable to allow about 20 minutes to pass through security checks. Timings and room numbers are subject to change.

Further Information

The Scrutiny Unit can help with any queries about oral evidence.

Key areas of the Bill

Summary of the Bill

  • Provisions in relation to local government, including a general power of competence for local authorities and relevant Fire and Rescue Authorities, changes to local authority governance arrangements  including provision for directly elected mayors, the abolition of the Standards Board regime, and requirements for  local authorities to set senior pay policy statements.
  • Provisions  relating to community empowerment, including  giving people, councillors and councils the power to instigate local referendums on any local issue and a power to approve or veto in a referendum a council tax increase deemed to be excessive, and enabling voluntary and community bodies and others to express an interest in running a local authority service, and local community groups to bid or buy buildings or land which are listed as assets of community value,
  • Reform of the planning system; including provisions to abolish regional strategies, provide for neighbourhood development orders and plans, make pre-application consultation compulsory, and make changes to planning enforcement.
  • Provisions to reform social housing including measures to offer flexible tenancies for new social tenants; create a new system of council housing finance; provide assistance for tenants to exchange their social rented property; and transfer the functions of the Tenant Service Authority to the Homes and Communities Agency.
  • Abolition of the Home Information Pack.
  • Provisions for London that provide the Mayor with additional powers relating to housing and regeneration.
  • Abolition of the London Development Agency.

http://www.parliament.uk/business/news/2011/january/localism-bill-commit...

kevin
kevin's picture
Offline
Last seen: 51 weeks 1 day ago
Joined: 09/03/2009
Final countdown begins to full council transparency

Councils have been put on a week's notice to get their books open for public scrutiny, Local Government Secretary Eric Pickles said today, 25 January 2011.

Last June, Mr Pickles set a deadline for councils to become more transparent by publishing all of their spending data over £500 online in accessible formats, at the end of January 2011.

Today the Local Government Secretary is starting the final week countdown for councils to show their residents that they are ready to be open and transparent about how they spend taxpayers' money.

Over 210 councils across the country have put some information online, but this leaves almost 150 still to act. A timeline on the Department's website shows who has put their data online while making it crystal clear which councils are leaving it to the eleventh hour.

A draft code of practice will be published shortly to help councils get on track.

Councils are expected to put details of senior pay, councillor expenses, tenders and contracts, meetings, and frontline service data into the open so that 'armchair auditors' can clearly see the decisions being made on their behalf by the council in due course.

The Department for Communities and Local Government has already set the precedent for councils to follow, regularly publishing all spend data over £500.

Communities Secretary Eric Pickles said:

"I've called for every council to become more open and accountable about every aspect of their work, starting with getting all expenditure over £500 online by the end of this month. Transparency can help save money in tough times protecting frontline services, by cutting waste and unnecessary costs.

"The final countdown for councils has begun. In the last six months more than half of all councils have got their house in order. Today I'm putting those councils still to open up on one week's notice.

"The public have a right to know how their tax pounds are spent, and those yet to deliver are running out of excuses and time before they have to face their electorate - I hope every council chooses to do so openly, transparently and democratically."

Notes to editors

1. The list of council that have already told DCLG they have put their spending data online is at: http://www.communities.gov.uk/localgovernment/transparency/localgovernmentexpenditure/.

2. The timeline of when councils went online is at:
http://www.communities.gov.uk/localgovernment/transparency/localgovernmentexpenditure/timeline/.

3. The Department for Communities is leading the way across Whitehall and Local Government by publishing all its expenditure over £500 online too. This can be found at: http://www.communities.gov.uk/corporate/transparencyingovernment/spenddata/.

4. Experian research suggests councils could be overpaying by as much as £150m a year: http://www.communities.gov.uk/newsstories/corporate/1738897.

http://www.communities.gov.uk/news/localgovernment/1825219

kevin
kevin's picture
Offline
Last seen: 51 weeks 1 day ago
Joined: 09/03/2009
The Localism Bill

The Localism Bill (external link) was introduced to Parliament on 13 December 2010.

This Bill will shift power from central government back into the hands of individuals, communities and councils.

We are committed to this because over time central government has become too big, too interfering, too controlling and too bureaucratic. This has undermined local democracy and individual responsibility, and stifled innovation and enterprise within public services.

We want to see a radical shift in the balance of power and to decentralise power as far as possible. Localism isn't simply about giving power back to local government. This Government trusts people to take charge of their lives and we will push power downwards and outwards to the lowest possible level, including individuals, neighbourhoods, professionals and communities as well as local councils and other local institutions.

  • for services which are used individually, this means putting power in the hands of individuals themselves
  • where services are enjoyed collectively, they should be delivered by accountable community groups
  • where the scale is too large or those using a service are too dispersed, they should be delivered by local institutions, subject
    to democratic checks and balances, enabled by full transparency.

The Localism Bill includes a number of important packages:

  • decentralisation and strengthening local democracy
  • Non-Domestic Rates
  • community empowerment
  • a radical re-boot of the planning system including neighbourhood planning
  • changes to social housing policies
  • devolving Powers to the Mayor and London Boroughs.

The measures in the Bill exemplify and take forward the six actions of decentralisation that underpin the Government's approach to decentralisation. See Decentralisation and the Localism Bill: an essential guide for further background (available for download below).

Related publications

http://www.communities.gov.uk/localgovernment/decentralisation/localismb...

kevin
kevin's picture
Offline
Last seen: 51 weeks 1 day ago
Joined: 09/03/2009
Localism Bill impact assessments published

Evidence underpinning the measures in the Localism Bill to aid analysis and discussion was published today (see link, right).

The Localism Bill will put an end to the centralisation of power in government allowing local communities and councils the freedom to run their lives and neighbourhoods in their own way.

The impact assessments report on the potential impact of implementing the decentralisation and localism elements of the Coalition Agreement. They will help promote the devolution of power away from Westminster and Whitehall to local councils and communities.

Decentralisation Minister Greg Clark said:

"Any public policy has pros and cons. In one of the most comprehensive exercises undertaken by any government department to date, we are setting out our frank assessment of the effects of our radical proposals. This demonstrates our commitment to openness and transparency. These reports prove the net benefits to local economies, to local democracy and to community life of the Coalition Government's decentralisation programme."

The set of Impact Assessments should be considered together within the context of the overall Localism Bill. They cover the following:

  • the abolition of the Standards Board Regime, clarification of the law on predetermination and the requirement to register and declare interests
  • giving councils greater freedoms over their governance arrangements
  • creating executive mayors in the 12 largest English cities
  • local referendums
  • general power of competence
  • general powers for Fire and Rescue Authorities
  • community right to challenge
  • community Right to Buy
  • Business Rates Supplements - requirement for a ballot for all Business Rate Supplement proposals
  • discretionary business rates discounts
  • small business rates relief automation
  • local government senior officer pay accountability
  • cancellation of certain backdated non-domestic rates liabilities
  • provision for referendums to veto excessive council tax increases
  • abolition of the regional planning tier and introduction of the Duty to Cooperate
  • major infrastructure projects
  • updated final impact assessment for the Community Infrastructure Levy
  • local plan reform
  • compulsory pre-application consultation between prospective developers and local communities
  • enforcement package
  • neighbourhood plans and community Right to Build
  • payment of EU infraction fines by local and other public authorities
  • repeal of Home Information Packs
  • reforming the annual Housing Revenue Account subsidy system
  • reform of social housing regulation
  • creating a single housing ombudsman
  • a fairer future for social housing
  • devolution package: provision of housing and regeneration powers to the Greater London Authority, abolition of the London Development Agency, enabling powers for the Mayor to designate Mayoral Development Corporations

http://www.communities.gov.uk/news/localgovernment/1830947

kevin
kevin's picture
Offline
Last seen: 51 weeks 1 day ago
Joined: 09/03/2009
Local Government Finance - HOC

Bob Neill (Parliamentary Under Secretary of State, Communities and Local Government; Bromley and Chislehurst, Conservative)

Further to my statement on Monday 31 January on the local government finance settlement, I am announcing that I will be making a technical change to the provisional formula grant allocations for 2012-13 increasing the overall total for formula grant by £11.3 million.

I have today placed in the Library of the House revised tables which reflect this change. Copies are available from the Vote Office and should be referred to in place of those issued on Monday 31 January which related to the 2012-13 settlement. All local authorities have been notified directly today of this change.

http://www.theyworkforyou.com/wms/?id=2011-02-07a.1WS.4

kevin
kevin's picture
Offline
Last seen: 51 weeks 1 day ago
Joined: 09/03/2009
Localism Bill and EDF briefing

On 13 December 2010, the Department for Communities and Local Government published the Localism Bill. The Equality and Diversity Forum (EDF) produced a briefing for the House of Commons second reading of the Bill.

The Localism Bill is intended to strengthen local democracy by:

  • Devolving significant new powers to councils
  • Establishing powerful new rights for local people and communities, including greater powers for local people to hold their local authorities to account
  • Radically reforming planning
  • Making housing fairer and more democratic
  • Creating powerful incentives for economic growth

‘Decentralisation and the Localism Bill: an essential guide’ was also published by the Department for communities and Local Government on 13 December. The guide ‘makes the case for a radical shift of power from the centralised state to local communities, and describes the six essential actions required to deliver decentralisation down through every level of government to every citizen. In particular, we focus on the Localism Bill, which will provide the legislative foundation for change’.

Click here for announcement

Click here for link to the Localism Bill 2010-2011

Click here for a Plain English Guide to the Localism Bill

Click here for ‘Decentralisation and the Localism Bill: an essential guide’

Click here for EDF briefing

Click here for NCVO briefing

http://www.edf.org.uk/blog/?p=8601

anonymous (not verified)
anonymous's picture
Localism Bill

Exactly how much money is being spent on this Bill, in referendums, Wages for elected Mayors, All the trappings? etc

When we (our Country) is so strapped for cash at the moment, is THIS the best way to go about saving a bit here and there?

Instead of reducing MP's by 50, why not save money by saving the 50 and getting rid of all the rest?   No more body's in the House of Lords either.

kevin
kevin's picture
Offline
Last seen: 51 weeks 1 day ago
Joined: 09/03/2009
Localism – friend or foe to infrastructure in new communities?

Caterham Barracks has been cited in case study after case study as a paragon of public involvement in creating new communities. The development of the former Army base has been praised as a fine example of community-led planning, providing homes for local people while the developers made a handsome profit.

So why can't we achieve such successes more often? And why are even the success stories so fragile?

The fourth of the Joseph Rowntree Foundation's seminars on community assets sought to address these questions, and to probe how far the Coalition Government's localism policies might improve or undermine community infrastructure in residential developments. Could a devolved, locally driven approach to planning and housing give us better results?

If this is an opportunity, the key message from Caterham is that it needs to be handled with care. 'The one thing you need is time,' said Dick Moran, Chief Executive of Caterham Barracks Community Trust. Local people were involved in discussions about the site’s future even before its closure in 1995 – aided by local councillors who were prepared to use their position to maximum effect.

Despite its successes, the community trust has struggled to keep its head above water since the recession began. 'We have serviced offices that are 50 per cent full and need to be 70 per cent full to break even, so we may have to sell a building,' Mr Moran said. 'We have £2m of debts. When times are tough it’s hard to sustain the borrowing.' An additional loan of £150,000 would cost £40,000 in fees and bank charges, he pointed out.

Getting a consensus that we have to find better ways of achieving community benefits isn’t difficult. Working out how to put that ideal into practice, and how to build the necessary skills and generate the required resources, is more problematic.

Independent consultant Marilyn Taylor, introducing the day's discussions, highlighted the progress over the last decade in understanding the importance of community infrastructure – the people to support the residents of a new community, not just the buildings and facilities. 'I hope we’re not forgetting all that learning we worked so hard for,' she commented.

But she acknowledged that much more could have been achieved. 'I can take you to places where all the community got from section 106 planning agreements was a new roundabout. We need a co-produced process where everyone gets together and thinks about the future demographic of a place.'

Dr Taylor argued that three elements were essential to good development: empowerment, community development and stewardship (or 'active governance'); and that community ownership could be a powerful means of achieving these. Such ideas were very much in line with the Government's 'Big Society' objectives, she suggested.

Yet there was strong scepticism from participants at the seminar that the ideals of the Big Society and localism could be achieved in practice. The ideas were not thought through and would result in a patchwork quilt of activity, with the strong doing well while weaker communities struggled, many argued.

One suggested that the approach was a Darwinian one that would result in the survival of the 'fittest' communities; others said the ideas would work well in shire counties where governance arrangements were relatively simple and parish councils were well established, but not in complex urban neighbourhoods where population turnover was high and it was harder to bring communities together, and where activists or local representatives often lacked support.

Overall the mood of the event was sceptical and cautious: yes, some of the initiatives in the Localism Bill might help local residents have a greater say in the design and running of new developments. Against that had to be weighed the loss of regional infrastructure, the loss of resources, and the risks of 'asset dumping' by the public sector and 'asset stripping' by private businesses.

But Neil Stott, Chief Executive of Keystone Development Trust in Norfolk, warned against becoming obsessed with the implications of the latest policy announcement.

"We have to think how can we work in a different way in a more challenging regime – we have a duty to try to think it through in a more rational way,' he argued. 'If we slavishly look at the Localism Bill and Big Society as the way forward that’s not the answer.'

Interested in the issues raised here?

http://www.jrf.org.uk/blog/2011/03/localism-friend-or-foe

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
X
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Loading