Skip to main content

Consultation on Reimbursement Arrangements for the Concessionary Bus Travel Scheme in England - Ends 11/11/2010

5 replies [Last post]
kevin
kevin's picture
Offline
Last seen: 51 weeks 6 hours ago
Joined: 09/03/2009
Date published:
17 September 2010
Closing date:
11 November 2010

Summary

Consultation on Reimbursement Arrangements for the Concessionary Bus Travel Scheme in England.

This consultation is seeking views on revised reimbursement guidance for the scheme, the proposed associated legislative changes and future options for more radical reform.

The Reimbursement Calculator which goes with the new guidance is undergoing some final validations checks and will be published here in due course.

Download documents


Consultation on reimbursement arrangements for the Concessionary Bus Travel Scheme in England (96 kb)

Published:
17 September 2010

Concessionary travel for older and disabled people: guidance on reimbursing bus operators - draft (466 kb)

Published:
17 September 2010

Annex B -Impact Assessment (193 kb)

Published:
17 September 2010

Consultation response form (317 kb)

Published:
17 September 2010

Reply to consultation

Tel: 0207 944 5427
Email: concessionaryfares@dft.gsi.gov.uk

Post:

Concessionary Travel
Department for Transport
3/21, Great Minster House


76 Marsham Street
London
SW1P 4DR
 
http://www.dft.gov.uk/consultations/open/2010-34/

kevin
kevin's picture
Offline
Last seen: 51 weeks 6 hours ago
Joined: 09/03/2009
Research into the Reimbursement of Concessionary Fares

Summary

These reports cover the research into the reimbursement of revenues and costs to bus operators for carrying concessionary passengers. The research was undertaken by the ITS, University of Leeds, Professor Phil Goodwin and Andrew Last (Minnerva).

Download PDF

Download RTF/Word

Order printed copies

This publication is only available online.

Help accessing downloadable file formats

Most publications are available in portable document format (PDF) or rich text format (RTF) for downloading and reading offline. PDF files may only be compatible with the latest version of the free Adobe Acrobat Reader .

People with visual difficulties may find it useful to learn about improving the accessibility of Acrobat documents at the Adobe Accessibility Resource Centre .

For information about RTF and zip files please visit help with downloads.

If you are unable to access a publication, please contact us to organise a suitable alternative format.

http://www.dft.gov.uk/pgr/regional/buses/concessionary/informationlocala...

John
John's picture
Offline
Last seen: 13 hours 5 min ago
Joined: 09/03/2008
Impact to operators provision - Ethinc groups & Women

The impact assessment in Annex B highlights that "How?" operators respond to any change may have an impact on certain groups.

"VI) Specific Impact Tests
 
1) Statutory Equalities Duties
 
The extent to which the preferred option would have an impact on different groups will depend on how operators respond to the new reimbursement arrangements. As discussed above (section 4) it is possible that bus operators would respond to a reduction in reimbursement by increasing fares and/or reducing services. This could have a slight negative impact on concessionary passholders and other buspassengers. Local authorities already have powers under existing legislation to secure socially necessary services if these are not provided by the commercial market. This provides TCAs with the flexibility to address any specific issues which arise when implementing the new guidance in rural areas.
 
We are aware from the National Travel Survey that women have higher passholding and bus trip rates than men and that bus trip rates by ethnic minorities are higher than by white British people. Therefore women and ethnic minorities may be impacted upon more by any reduction in services made as an indirect consequence of the changes in the reimbursement arrangements. There is no data available on pass holding and bus trip rates by religion, belief, sexual orientation or transgender.
 
The concessionary travel scheme is targeted at disabled people and those who have attained female state pension age (regardless of whether they are male or female). The proposed changes to the reimbursement arrangements between TCAs and bus operators (Option 2) are designed to facilitate more accurate levels of reimbursement and as such will assist in securing the long-term financial sustainability of the scheme thus protecting the associated benefits that it provides to older and disabled people."

 

John
John's picture
Offline
Last seen: 13 hours 5 min ago
Joined: 09/03/2008
Reply from London Councils

I recieved this reply to an email about this on the 22nd November 2010

"Dear John,
 
Many thanks for your inquiry- my apologies that you have not received a reply sooner. As you are probably aware, it has recently become for this Bill to proceed due to action by the Mayor of London. Following a response by the Mayor at Mayor’s Question Time on 14th September, the Transport Commissioner, Peter Hendy, wrote to London Councils to inform us that TfL would not continue with the five-year deal or support our legislation to make changes to the Reserve Scheme and rail provisions (the amendments in the proposed Bill). In the letter, Mr Hendy said that:

“TfL now faces cuts to its government grant. This makes it impossible for TfL to absorb the gap between the cost of the Freedom Pass scheme and the settlements provided for in the five year deal. As a result, TfL is no longer in a position to sign the draft deal. Recent circumstances have been quite exceptional and would have led to TfL exercising its right to terminate even if the deal had been signed last year. TfL agreed to support arbitration for the Reserve Scheme settlement as part of the negotiations leading up to the five year deal package. Without this being in place, TfL does not believe the proposed changes to the statutory framework surrounding the Freedom Pass are appropriate.”
 
I am sorry that you have taken the time to email us even though this Bill is no longer under proposition."

kevin
kevin's picture
Offline
Last seen: 51 weeks 6 hours ago
Joined: 09/03/2009
Additional information

The recent publication by HM Government dated 20th October 2010.

LOCAL GOVERNMENT AND THE SPENDING REVIEW

The Coalition Government’s Spending Review set out today provides a fair though challenging settlement for local government. It reflects the clear priorities for the Spending Review as a whole: to bring down the massive budget deficit and drive economic growth, while protecting the interests of hardworking families and the most vulnerable in society.

http://www.communities.gov.uk/documents/localgovernment/pdf/1745945.pdf

kevin
kevin's picture
Offline
Last seen: 51 weeks 6 hours ago
Joined: 09/03/2009
"Minor changes" to concessionary bus passes will hit vulnerable

"Minor changes" to concessionary bus passes will hit vulnerable people with with autism

Dear Department for Transport,

The Department for Transport have apparently set new rules re: who is eligible to apply for concessionary bus passes. It came to our attention only when Essex County Council changed their rules for applications.

In Essex, only disabled people who are in receipt of the higher rate Mobility component of DLA will qualify for the free bus pass. Chelmsford Borough Council and Braintree District Council application forms clearly state that the applicant must have the HIGHER RATE Mobility to qualify. There were other qualifying conditions, i.e. applicant Blind or has a Blue Badge, but nothing that would cover autism.

That must surely mean that most of the Autistic community will be disqualified from applying for a free bus pass, we do not know of ANYONE who gets the Higher Rate mobility component - because DLA is so VERY VERY HARD TO GET, if you have a HIDDEN disability.

The DLA form is geared up mainly to physical disability in any case, and effectively excludes many needy vulnerable people with autism / HIDDEN disability. It is also assessed by people who do not understand hidden disability such as learning difficulties or autism.

These "minor" eligibility changes are utterly unfair and will mean a lot of people with autism who are already struggling financially (because of widespread lack of access to work and benefits, and total lack of ANY support) will be penalised.

Re: "Minor changes". I think this must be the appropriate page?
http://www.dft.gov.uk/pgr/regional/buses...

Q: When is a "minor" change a devastating change?

A: When a new rule / policy fails to be informed and throught through with regard for fairness, equality or consideration of HIDDEN disability (which is so wearingly and depressingly often misunderstood, and judged, by those who are too intellectually lazy to research and try and understand it).

Why were these changes made?

Who made them?

Who was consulted?

What information informed this decision?

It seem that as usual when money is tight, the most vulnerable -
who are already suffering - have to suffer more.

Thank you

A freedom of information request http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/minor_changes_to_concessionary_b

http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/free_bus_passes_only_for_those_w

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
X
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Loading