Community mental health services
There are a lot of community services available to support your medical care - your health worker will be able to tell you if you are eligible.
You may have to pay for some services, or contribute towards them. This is determined by a 'means test'. This is where social services will ask you questions about your income and capital to see whether you should pay or not.
Community care workers can give advice on:
- how to access employment, education or voluntary work
- financial support such as benefits
- what local facilities are available and how to use them
Day care
Day care centres
These centres are often run by voluntary organisations and offer support and social activities. Your doctor or care co-ordinator may refer you after an assessment. Some places allow you to just turn up; this is called self-referral.
Befriending: one-to-one support
Befriending services are run by voluntary organisations, where volunteers are given specialist training to give support and friendship on a one-to-one basis. You can ask to be part of this scheme; you don't need to be referred.
Help at home with everyday tasks
Local councils can provide services such as a laundry service, meals on wheels and home helps if social services think that it will help you to stay in your home or community. You will need to have a community care assessment to get access to these services.
Supporting People programme
The Supporting People programme gives support and advice about services that make it easier to stay in your own home, like cooking, paying bills or budgeting.
Accommodation
Supported housing and group homes
These schemes provide furnished housing for those who can live independently but benefit from having access to support workers.
You will need to have a community care assessment to get a place in one of these schemes, and you may have to pay - there is a means test to determine this.
Therapeutic communities
These communities are shared houses where people usually stay for an agreed period of time. House mates have access to a resident therapist and are supported through their rehabilitation.
You will need to have a community care assessment to get a place in a therapeutic community, and you may have to pay - there is a means test to determine this.
Hostels
Hostels provide short-term housing with the aim of encouraging independence while supporting your needs. Workers include nurses, social workers and mental health support workers.
You will need to have a community care assessment to get a place at a hostel, and you may have to pay - there is a means test to determine this.
Care homes
24-hour care can be provided by residential social workers, nurses and mental health support workers. This is for people who need a high level of care and find it hard to manage in their own home, despite other community care schemes.
You will need to have a community care assessment to get a place at a care home, and you may have to pay - there is a means test to determine this.
Additional links
See also...
Mental health advice from the NHS
The NHS choices website offers help and advice on both dementia and depression
Do it online
Useful contacts
http://www.direct.gov.uk/en/DisabledPeople/HealthAndSupport/MentalHealth...
Download Community care (PDF File, 618kb)
To download a PDF version of this leaflet click on the PDF icon above. PDF files require you to have a copy of Acrobat® Reader in order to be able to read them. This piece of software is freely available from the download pages on Adobe's web site.
1. Introduction
If you or someone you know or look after finds it difficult to manage day-to-day living, you may be able to get help in the form of community care. This leaflet explains how to find out what help you may be able to get, and whether you will have to pay for it.
There is information on:
2. Where do I start if I think I need help?
3. What kind of help is there?
4. Can I get help if I look after someone?
5. Who pays if I get care in my home?
6. What if I have to go into hospital?
7. What if I need to move into a care home?
8. What if I need ongoing nursing care?
9. Will I have to sell my home?
10. Can I claim any benefits if I am in residential care?
11. What choice of care home do I have?
12. What if I want to move to a care home that costs more than the council will pay?
13. What if my move into a care home is temporary?
14. What rights do I have when I am in a care home?
15. What if I have difficulty getting the care I need?
Many of us will need a helping hand with everyday tasks at some point in our lives. You may have an impairment or illness, or you may look after a child or adult who cannot look after themselves. This may be someone who has a physical or learning disability, or someone who is elderly. Whoever they are, they may be able to get 'community care' – help that can include anything from meals on wheels to a temporary or permanent stay in a care home.
The leaflets in this series give you an outline of your legal rights. They are not a complete guide to the law and are not intended to be a guide to how the law will apply to you or to any specific situation. The leaflets are regularly updated but the law may have changed since this was printed, so information in it may be incorrect or out of date.
If you have a problem, you will need to get more information or personal advice to work out the best way to solve it. See 'Further help' for sources of information and advice.
This leaflet is published by the Legal Services Commission (LSC). It was written in association with Sue Bloomfield, a freelance consumer affairs writer.
Leaflet version: May 2008
http://www.communitylegaladvice.org.uk/en/legalhelp/leaflet19_1.jsp
"Start each day by affirming peaceful, contented and happy attitudes and your days will tend to be pleasant and successful". So wrote Norman Vincent Peale, author of the 1952 bestseller, The Power of Positive Thinking. Peale's prescription for contentment has been regurgitated and recycled in thousands of self-help books over the past half-century, but despite a never-ending avalanche of sales, the alluringly simple "think happy-be happy" formula hasn't made much of a dent in mental suffering. According to the World Health Organisation, depression is set to be the planet's second biggest cause of disability by 2020.
Now, a study published in Psychological Science confirms what many people have discovered from personal experience – not only do crude positive thinking techniques often fail, but for some they can be counterproductive. Researchers at the University of Waterloo in Ontario evaluated people's self-esteem levels before and after they were asked to repeat typical mantras such as, "I am a loveable person", and found that while the affirmations helped those who already felt good about themselves, they made subjects with low self-worth feel even worse.
For those of us weary of what psychiatrist Jimmie Holland calls the "tyranny of positive thinking", these results are more likely to boost our mood than ploughing through The Secret. It's not that optimism is a bad thing (it isn't), or that cultivating cheerfulness can't lead to a happier experience of life (it can), but in their eagerness to sell blanket positivity as a surefire cure for gloom, the self-help gurus miss out on a crucial first step to transformation – a willingness to accept your current circumstances.
Viewed from a Buddhist angle, self-help is an oxymoron. Any technique designed to bolster the self is bound to lead to more, not less suffering, because clinging to ego is considered the source of anguish in the first place. However, when we let go of the desire for self–improvement, we can relax with the mind instead of badgering it into well–being. By surrendering the battle with neurotic fixations, paradoxically they start to fall away, or at very least, the space created by dropping the struggle makes them seem less powerful, and loom less large.
Mature spiritual traditions tend to be good at developing this spacious mindset. Magnificent architecture, inspiring liturgies, and a community of practitioners dedicated to discovering ultimate reality, are reminders to expand beyond concerns about the self and see them in a panoramic perspective (to be "a grain of sand with gigantic eyes" as Chogyam Trungpa Rinpoche once put it). But neither is it a preserve of the religious – Richard Dawkins has written movingly of the awe to be experienced when opening up to a vast and wonderful natural world.
Crude positive thinking on the other hand, and self–help in general, tends towards the small–minded. Spawned in our materialist, consumerist culture, it locates problems and solutions within the tight confines of the individual (me, me, me!). This ignores the fact that our circumstances, and our thought patterns, are part of a wider set of causes and conditions – genetics, family history, social and economic situation, the existential limitations of birth, ageing, sickness and death – over which we may have little or no control. By telling people they can take full and immediate charge of their lives with a bit of early morning mental jiu-jitsu, advocates of positive thinking end up making some people feel even more frustrated – adding the guilt of failure to depression.
The authors of the Ontario study came to just that conclusion. Affirmations which fly in the face of facts, or negative perception of the facts, cruelly highlight the contrast between how some people would like to feel and how they actually feel. This then become another stick for self-flagellation, a reminder of all the ways in which that person feels inadequate.
Perhaps this is why the most promising new psychological treatments focus less on positive thinking and self–improvement, but on developing qualities such as acceptance, mindful awareness, wisdom and compassion. Indeed, out of five evidence-based recommendations for mental health made in the government's Foresight report last autumn, four could be considered recastings of traditional "spiritual" values – "Connect" (love others), "Keep Learning" (develop wisdom), "Take Notice" (meditate), and "Give" (be charitable). Whether you decide to view these strategies as spiritual is irrelevent – they lead to wellbeing irrespective of your take on the existence of God or the hereafter.
With his books Turning The Mind into An Ally,and Ruling Your World, Buddhist teacher Sakyong Mipham Rinpoche joked that he was trying to start a new publishing genre – "other-help" – to rival the mountains of ego–fuelling, Peale copycats stacked up at WH Smith and Waterstones. Clearly the genre has yet to takeoff, but the growing popularity of authors grounded in the acceptance approach (Pema Chödron, for example) suggests that more people are realising their minds cannot be cajoled into confidence by growling "I'm A Tiger" in front of the mirror.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/belief/2009/jul/15/self-help-pos...
Mori poll finds 9% of carers have given up work to care, while Carers UK raises concerns on benefit access
Almost one in three carers are caring for a loved-one for over 50 hours a week while 9% had given up work and 7% reduced their hours, a survey has found.
An Ipsos Mori poll conducted for today's Carers Rights Day found that carers spent 27 hours a week caring on average and had been caring for an average of six and a half years. The company surveyed over 650 current or past carers as part of a wider poll of 4,000 adults last month.
A separate survey of 350 carers by Carers UK, which organises Carers Rights Day, found over a third of carers are not getting the benefits they are entitled to because they do not know they can claim them.
Half of this group said not getting these benefits had affected their health, while 20% said they would not now be in debt had they claimed.
Carers UK chief executive Imelda Redmond said: "Caring can take a massive toll on carers' finances. Whilst facing hugely reduced incomes from giving up work or reducing their hours, carers face all the additional costs of care.”
http://www.communitycare.co.uk/Articles/2009/12/04/113363/carers-rights-...
Most of the councils did not know they would face extra scrutiny until earlier this week, claims directors' leader
The Association of Directors of Adult Social Services' president has lambasted the Care Quality Commission over its treatment of the eight councils rated 'adequate' in this year's annual performance assessment.
Jenny Owen said most of the eight did not know that they were going to be categorised as "priority for improvement" following yesterday's assessment until Owen informed them earlier this week.
The impact was compounded after some national newspapers used yesterday's news to say the eight - Bromley, Cornwall, Peterborough, Poole, Solihull, South Tyneside and Southwark - had been "named and shamed" by the CQC.
Priority for improvement councils receive extra scrutiny from the regulator, through closer engagement with area managers, and from Department of Health regional officials.
However, Owen said some of them had not heard from the CQC for months, which "doesn't imply an urgent need to improve, does it?".
She claimed local and regional CQC inspectors had been pleased with progress made by the councils, which meant the negative headlines caught them by surprise.
Owen said the press reports had detracted from the fact that this was "the best overall performance since ratings records began", with 95% of councils now rated good or excellent, up from 87% last year.
She also raised questions over the link between an adequate rating and being priority for improvement, adding: "I don't know if 'adequate' is the new poor because adequate used to mean that things were okay."
A CQC spokesperson said: "We have an excellent dialogue with ADASS and we always listen with great care to what the organisation says. They are absolutely right to point out that the gradings show an overall improvement and that the vast majority of councils have done well, as we ourselves have emphasised very strongly.
"It is also good that ADASS recognises that they are important areas needing improvement on behalf of service users. We look forward to working with them on these issues."
Owen's criticisms follow an attack on the CQC by Southwark Council, after it was downgraded from 'excellent' to 'adequate', following an inspection in April and May. Annie Shepperd, chief executive of the south London authority, accused the CQC of making a 'flawed' and 'inaccurate' assessment of the council, though the regulator stood by its judgement.
Related articles
Eight councils face CQC scrutiny after adequate rating
CQC: Councils improve for seventh year running in adult care
CQC ratings: Reactions from the sector
http://www.communitycare.co.uk/Articles/2009/12/04/113366/adasss-owen-at...
London boroughs are delivering a high standard of care according to results published by an independent watchdog today (Thursday).
The Care Quality Commission (CQC) has released figures assessing all councils in England on how they are arranging and delivering social care services.
In London 94 per cent of boroughs are graded "well" or "excellent" with six boroughs improving their ratings this year. Eleven London boroughs (33 per cent) are now rated as excellent, which is above the national average (22 per cent).
Councils were rated against a number of performance indicators including improving quality of life - an area where London boroughs fared very well.
Councillor Mike Freer, London Councils' Executive Member for Health and Adult services said, "The CQC results reflect some of the great work that is being done across the capital. I am delighted that London is topping the tables compared to other regions. However, we will not rest on our laurels - improvements can always be made, and London's boroughs will continue to strive to offer the highest standards of care."
Councillor Michael White, London Councils' Executive Member for Improvement said, "While these results show that London boroughs as a whole are performing strongly, they also highlight a few areas for improvement across the capital. London's improvement body, Capital Ambition will be keen to support all boroughs in their work to provide the very best services for their residents."
http://www.londoncouncils.gov.uk/media/current/pressdetail.htm?pk=852&showpage=-1
R64: Shaping the Future of Care Together: Disability Alliance response to the Department of Health Green Paper on adult social care reform in England
Click to view response and other information.
- r64 - pdf version
- r64 - word version
- shaping the future of care together - link to green paper and summary
http://www.disabilityalliance.org/r64.htm
People can check the quality of public services across England on a new website set up by the Audit Commission.
It is the first time information from inspectorates of services including health, social care and the police has been pooled in this way.
The "Oneplace" website divides England into 152 areas and uses a coloured flags system to rate performance.
It is intended to help poor performers learn from the best, as well as letting people compare their area with others.
Users of the site will be able to "check on everything from care of the elderly to progress in reducing the number of teenage pregnancies", says BBC
local government correspondent John Andrew.
A green flag will denote exceptional performance, while a red flag will identify services giving cause for concern.
The website also features tables for council performance, assembled using toughened assessment that rated just 14 councils as excellent, while 11 share the lowest rating of poor.
However, the website "could be short-lived", according to our correspondent.
"The Conservatives say they'll abolish this system of area assessment if they win the next election and target inspections on areas that need them," he said.
Communities Secretary John Denham said: "It is just the start of our efforts to give local people far better access to information held by local public organisations so they can challenge, compare or scrutinise their local services in order to drive up standards in their area."
http://oneplace.direct.gov.uk/Pages/default.aspx
http://www.audit-commission.gov.uk/localgov/pages/default.aspx
A ground-breaking website that exposes the quality of public services – from children's welfare to council recycling, and crime fighting to teaching – goes live today amid a row over its cost and accuracy.
Oneplace, an ambitious collaboration involving six independent inspectorates, is intended to provide a consumer guide to the performance of local authorities, police forces, schools, NHS primary care trusts, prisons and probation services.
The website draws together assessments by the Audit Commission, Ofsted, the Care Quality Commission, and the inspectorates of constabulary, probation and prisons. Reports on the overall performance of councils in England, and ratings for children's services, are also revealed at the launch of the website, highlighting the best and worst.
But the Conservative party said it would abolish the comprehensive area assessments (CAAs) developed by the Audit Commission, which form the backbone of the new ratings.
And although they were among the overall top performers, two Conservative-led councils – Wandsworth, and Hammersmith and Fulham – announced they would no longer participate fully in CAAs due to the excessive demands on their time and finances.
The Audit Commission revealed a correlation between affluence and top scores. Those rated as excellent in "organisational assessments" include six of the most affluent boroughs in London. Others praised are Hampshire, Leicestershire, Sevenoaks and Tameside.
The worst performers include several West Country authorities – Mendip, Mid Devon, West Somerset, Forest of Dean, Doncaster, Haringey, and Eastbourne.
Similarly, the top 10 for children's services include eight London councils, York, and Blackburn. Listed as worst are Haringey, Doncaster, Birmingham, Cornwall ,and Warrington. Councils are graded from 1 (poor) to 4 (excellent).
"This new regime is too bland and too superficial to provide any meaningful insights," Edward Lister, the Conservative leader of Wandsworth council, told the Local Government Chronicle. "In attempting to cover just about every aspect of public life in the area, the reports simply descend into generalities. Despite the huge effort in cost and time, there is nothing here that provides any added value for our taxpayers. We are not going to waste another year propping up such a wasteful and poorly directed system."
His comments follow criticism of the annual league tables for NHS trusts produced by the Care Quality Commission, which rated Basildon and Thurrock NHS foundation trust as good when the commission's inspectors were uncovering bloody equipment and unusual death rates. The extent to which self-assessment forms are used has also been questioned.
The Oneplace website is organised by region and area. The Audit Commission said the start-up costs had been only £220,000, which does not include the inspection process. Green and red flags highlight particularly innovative or unsatisfactory services.
Blackpool is awarded a green flag for cutting homelessness, and Hackney for decreasing child mortality. Doncaster gets two red flags, for not meeting the needs of vulnerable people and "poor prospects of Doncaster's children and young people".
Suffolk distinguishes itself by having three green flags and two red. The county is praised for its exceptional performance in developing wind and wave power, for coastal protection in Bawdsey, and tackling street prostitution in Ipswich. It is criticised, however, for the a lack of high-value rural jobs and for poor learning and skills outcomes among children and young people.
The six inspectorates said: "Oneplace is for those who pay for local services, those who provide them, and those who depend on them. This is 21st-century accountability, based on expert assessments of what services do for people, not how they are organised.
"It paints a picture of places, their agreed local priorities, challenges and their public service performance. The website offers a way of checking the effectiveness of public spending and helps people hold those who provide publicly funded services to account for their decisions."
The shadow secretary for communities and local government, Caroline Spelman, said: "Labour have created an army of clipboard inspectors to monitor councils, which has done nothing to stop council tax doubling or frontline services like weekly bin collections being cut. "Conservatives will abolish the bureaucratic CAA, and target inspection where it's really needed, such as children's social services."
Communities secretary John Denham said: "The new assessment system is putting more information about the state of local services into the hands of the public than ever before.
"It is just the start of our efforts to give local people far better access to information held by local public organisations so they can challenge, compare or scrutinise their local services in order to drive up standards in their area.
"We expect all councils to be delivering the best local services possible and to respond to the challenges laid out in today's assessments.
The chairman of the Local Government Association, Margaret Eaton, said: "Inspection can be a useful source of information for councillors in their efforts to do the best they can for local people. But during these tricky financial times, it is important the processes don't get in the way of councils spending their valuable funds as efficiently as possible."
Cynthia Bower, chief executive of the Care Quality Commission, said: "Getting public agencies working together effectively is absolutely central to the provision of good health and social care. The findings from this work bring this issue sharply into focus."
Best
Camden, City of London, Hammersmith and Fulham, Hampshire, Kensington and Chelsea, Kent, Leicestershire, Tameside, Wandsworth, Westminster, Chorley, Rushcliffe, Sevenoaks, Staffordshire Moorlands, and Lancashire Fire and Rescue Service.
Worst
Ashfield, Boston, Brentwood, Craven, Eastbourne, Forest of Dean, Mendip, Mid-Devon, West Somerset, Doncaster, Haringey, and Cornwall Fire and Rescue Service.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2009/dec/09/oneplace-website-council-s...
London is the best performing region in the country according to figures released today (Wednesday) by the Audit Commission.
The new Comprehensive Area Assessments (CAA) not only show how well a council itself is managed but also how it works in partnership with organisations like the police and health services to improve the lives of their local residents.
It is the first year of the CAAs, in which boroughs receive scores out of four for how their authority is run, and are awarded green flags for examples of good practice in partnership working.
In London six boroughs have the highest overall score of four; with 24 boroughs being awarded a score of three. Nationally a total of 14 local authorities received the highest overall score – meaning London had 40 per cent of the top local authorities.
Eighteen London boroughs received a total of 22 green flags for work around issues including recycling, crime and community safety, climate change, arts and culture and looked after children.
London Councils Chairman, Councillor Merrick Cockell, said: “What matters far more than any inspection regime is that councils deliver on the priorities of their residents by working effectively with our partners to improve the quality of the local area.
“London’s total of 22 green flags is the most of any region, making up 30 per cent of the national total.
“The performances of London boroughs are a further testament to the hard work of councillors and council staff across the capital.”
The overall score awarded to each council is split between how the local authority manages its performance and how it uses its resources. Thirty one authorities received a score of three or four for managing performance and 23 were awarded a score of three or four for use of resources.
Councillor Michael White, chair of Capital Ambition, the partnership which supports council's improvement work said: “London boroughs will continue to provide and seek to improve on the first class services they give to Londoners.
“They are also working with Capital Ambition to deliver greater value for money through large scale efficiency savings, including joining up back office services and working together with partners in the wider commissioning of services.”
The CAA results showed that:
- six boroughs have an overall organisational score of four – Hammersmith & Fulham, Kensington & Chelsea, Wandsworth, Westminster, City of London, Camden.
- twenty four boroughs have an overall organisation score of three
- Camdenreceived a score of four for managing its resources, while 22 others received a mark of three.
Notes to editors
The Comprehensive Area Assessment (CAA) figures are released on Wednesday 9 December. For more information please visit the Audit Commission website.
The CAA has replaced the Comprehensive Performance Assessment carried out by the Audit Commission which simply looked at the performance of the local authority.
Capital Ambition is London’s Regional Improvement and Efficiency Partnership established to provide support to London’s authorities to improve performance and deliver efficiencies. It is part of London Councils.
http://www.londoncouncils.gov.uk/media/current/pressdetail.htm?pk=854&sh...
We live in turbulent times – the old world is in flux, buffeted by the shocks of the past two years, and from longer-term forces of change. Globalisation has brought us huge opportunities and growth. But it has also unleashed instability.
These new times make government more, not less, important. People want government to be there for them, to help them succeed and make the very best of life and the new opportunities the world offers. They do not want a government that leaves them to face these challenges alone.
As the world has changed, government must also remake itself to support people as they face these new challenges. Standing still risks jeopardising the improvements made to public services over the past decade. The question is not whether government itself is too big or too small, but whether it delivers for people and communities with rising aspirations and expectations.
Putting the frontline first: smarter government sets out how Government will improve public service outcomes while achieving the fiscal consolidation that is vital to helping the economy grow. The plan has three central actions: to drive up standards by strengthening the role of citizens and civic society, to free up public services by recasting the relationship between the centre and the frontline, and to streamline the centre of government, saving money for sharper delivery.
Having restored the value of government action, our task now is to develop smarter government that works in partnership with individuals and communities to deliver the services people want in the way they want them.
Commission to investigate disability related harassment and role of public authorities
Commission to hold Inquiry into harassment of disabled people
03 December 2009
The Commission today announced that it intends to conduct a Formal Inquiry into disability related harassment in England, Scotland and Wales and how public authorities are protecting disabled people’s human rights to live free from violence and abuse.
The announcement comes on the United Nations ‘International Day of Persons with Disabilities’. The Commission is the UN accredited human rights body for Great Britain with specific responsibilities to promote and monitor implementation of the recently ratified Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.
The Commission plans to use its legal powers to investigate the true extent of disability-related harassment and take appropriate action based on the evidence uncovered.
At the end of the Inquiry, public authorities found not to be doing enough to tackle the problem and to protect the human rights of disabled people could face legal action to force them to comply with their legal obligations.
Evidence already gathered by the Commission indicates that targeted violence or hostility towards disabled people is widespread in Britain. People with learning disabilities or mental health conditions in particular experience high levels of victimisation.
A report on the safety and security of disabled people published by the Commission earlier this year found that disabled people are four times more likely to be the victim of a crime than other people and are twice as likely to be the victim of a violent attack.
Mike Smith, Commissioner for the Equality and Human Rights Commission, said:
“There have been many well-documented cases where targeted hostility, bullying and antisocial behaviour has escalated into more serious violence, murder or the death of disabled people.
“The recent inquest into the tragic deaths of Fiona Pilkington and her daughter Francecca show that early intervention and preventative action are essential, and that public authorities have to work in partnership to tackle this problem effectively.
“Disabled people experiencing harassment can become conditioned to hostile treatment, or are sometimes told to ignore it by those around them – including by public authorities. They may also go to enormous lengths to avoid putting themselves at risk which can limit their freedom and opportunities. These are unacceptable outcomes for anyone in our society.
“Individual incidents can also have a much wider ‘ripple effect’, as other disabled people become aware that targeted violence and hostility is happening in their community may then fear for their own safety.”
The Commission will shortly publish draft Terms of Reference for the Inquiry, for consultation. Final Terms of Reference will then be published before the Inquiry begins in early 2010. The Inquiry will then report its findings within one year.
The Inquiry will gather and examine evidence from disabled people and others who have been affected by disability-related harassment and from public authorities on what steps they are taking to tackle the issue.
In particular, the Inquiry intends to look at the steps taken by public authorities to eliminate disability-related harassment and to address its causes, including prejudice and negative attitudes; and how public authorities have ensured the involvement of disabled people in eliminating harassment and its causes – for example by effective joined-up reporting procedures.
The Inquiry may also aim to identify examples of good practice in eliminating disability related harassment and addressing its causes.
The Commission will consider how public authorities have complied with their obligations in relation to the Disability Equality Duty set out in the Disability Discrimination Act 1995, the Human Rights Act, and the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.
The Commission has produced guidance to help public authorities understand what its duties and responsibilities are and how these duties should be implemented.
3 December 2009
- Watch a video of Cynthia Bower, CQC Chief Executive, speaking about the quality of adult social care
Adult social care has improved but a renewed effort is needed to eliminate poor quality services.
This is our first major statement on the quality of adult social care in England, based on our publication of the following documents:
- An assessment of 148 councils' social care services for adults (PDF, 1320KB, opens in new window)
- An analysis of whether councils are commissioning the best possible care (PDF, 62KB, opens in new window)
- An update on the performance of 24,000 care homes, home care agencies, nursing agencies and shared lives schemes(PDF, 2530KB, opens in new window)
- Our formal response to the government's Green Paper on social care, called Shaping the future of care together (PDF, 200KB, opens in new window)
Main findings
There has been a steady improvement in ratings awarded to councils. However, our assessment highlights concerns that affect people's lives:
- 95% of local authorities are performing either excellently or well in their commissioning of adult social care (compared to 87% in the previous year).
- One quarter of councils are rated only adequate in terms of giving people choice and control over their care.
- A third of councils must do more to care for people with dignity and respect.
Ratings for adult social care providers have improved but one in six providers are rated only poor or adequate:
- 77% of care homes, home care agencies, nursing agencies and shared lives schemes are rated excellent or good (compared to 69% in 2008).
- Around 400 regulated adult social care services are rated as poor and 3,500 as adequate.
- In care homes for older people, a fifth fail to meet the standard on social contact and activities.
We have also:
- found that councils must help get rid of poor quality care by purchasing from providers more effectively.
- identified councils where improvements in adult social care must be a priority.
- said we will be vigilant about spotting the impact of the economic downturn on people's access to social care.
- committed to raising the bar on councils and providers.
CQC comments
- Watch a video of Cynthia Bower, CQC Chief Executive, speaking about the quality of adult social care
Cynthia Bower, CQC Chief Executive, says:
"It's good to see the steady improvements and this should be recognised. However, I am concerned that many care homes and agencies have more to do to deliver the quality of care expected of them. Those affected should be absolutely clear that we will be very persistent in ensuring they take action in the run up to registration and afterwards, using all the new powers that will be at our disposal.
"There are also serious issues for councils to address in areas such as giving people more control over their care, treating people with dignity, and ensuring commissioning is as effective as possible. I want to see the regulator and councils working in tandem to drive poor quality care out of the market."
"It is striking that many of the issues of most concern to the public - such as dignity - are not necessarily things that cost a lot of money to put right. So there is clearly room to continue improving services, despite the tough economic backdrop. There is no excuse for taking the foot off the gas.
"I have to say however that I am deeply concerned about the potential impact of lower spending on social care. We all know there are choppy waters ahead, so the issue is how well the system responds to the situation. We plan to be particularly vigilant about this on behalf of people who use services."
Further information
- Find your council's annual performance assessment rating
- Read our press release: CQC praises improvements but calls for new drive to eliminate poor adult social care services
- Care regulator reveals highs and lows for people receiving social care: Regional press releases
http://www.cqc.org.uk//newsandevents/newsstories.cfm?cit_id=35577&FAArea...
Hospitals are facing the prospect of cuts over the next four years as part of a squeeze on NHS finances.
The amount they are paid for treating patients is to be frozen until 2014 as part of the government's productivity drive in England.
Health Secretary Andy Burnham said hospitals would have to start working differently, but added it would not necessarily mean hospital closures.
Hospital bosses described the task facing them as a "pretty tall order".
The freeze in hospital income was included in a five-year plan set out by Mr Burnham following the pre-Budget report on Wednesday.
He said the NHS was facing an "unprecedented productivity challenge" in the coming years.
Many predict between £15bn and £20bn needs to be saved from 2011 to 2014.
The budget will rise by more than 5% next year, but after that rises look likely to be much smaller as the government seeks to curb its spending to pay off debts.
The health service has been told it will get above inflation rises after 2011, but that could still feel like a cut for the NHS as it struggles to cope with demands from an ageing population and higher than inflation rises in the cost of equipment and drugs.
But while the NHS will be getting more as a whole, hospitals are facing a freeze in a major part of their income.
About 70% of hospital funding comes through a system known as payment by results.
It means hospitals are paid per patient treated rather than under the old method whereby they would get a lump sum based on traditional levels of activity.
The government introduced the system to make the NHS more competitive and it now applies to everything from hip operations to doctor consultations - only the most unpredictable parts of treatment, such as intensive care, are excluded.
'Tough'
Mr Burnham acknowledged the move was designed to ensure more patients are treated in the community, which is much cheaper than caring for them in hospitals.
"It is going to be tough... hospitals will have to change."
He suggested they could start working with other parts of the NHS to take services into the community - some senior doctors already run clinics in community health centres.
But he added it was "not correct" to assume there would be hospital closures.
Among the other measures set out by the health secretary was a plan to link NHS funding to patient satisfaction.
From 2012, the budgets of hospitals, GPs and other parts of the health service will be directly dependent on patient surveys.
Mr Burnham said he hoped in time patient ratings could account for up to 10% of the budget to help create more "patient-centred" care.
He also said he wanted to explore the idea of job guarantees for staff in return for accepting pay caps and the need for greater flexibility.
Nigel Edwards, of the NHS Confederation, which represents health managers, said: "The NHS has never before been asked to do something like this.
"It is a pretty tall order and we haven't got all the answers yet."
He said hospitals may have to close beds and even buildings, but that did not necessarily mean there would be poorer care.
"If general practice and hospitals work more closely we can reduce emergency admissions among patients with conditions such as diabetes. It is about working differently."
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/8406193.stm
3 December 2009
- Watch a video of Cynthia Bower, CQC Chief Executive, speaking about the quality of adult social care
Adult social care has improved but a renewed effort is needed to eliminate poor quality services.
This is our first major statement on the quality of adult social care in England, based on our publication of the following documents:
- An assessment of 148 councils' social care services for adults (PDF, 1320KB, opens in new window)
- An analysis of whether councils are commissioning the best possible care (PDF, 62KB, opens in new window)
- An update on the performance of 24,000 care homes, home care agencies, nursing agencies and shared lives schemes(PDF, 2530KB, opens in new window)
- Our formal response to the government's Green Paper on social care, called Shaping the future of care together (PDF, 200KB, opens in new window)
Main findings
There has been a steady improvement in ratings awarded to councils. However, our assessment highlights concerns that affect people's lives:
- 95% of local authorities are performing either excellently or well in their commissioning of adult social care (compared to 87% in the previous year).
- One quarter of councils are rated only adequate in terms of giving people choice and control over their care.
- A third of councils must do more to care for people with dignity and respect.
Ratings for adult social care providers have improved but one in six providers are rated only poor or adequate:
- 77% of care homes, home care agencies, nursing agencies and shared lives schemes are rated excellent or good (compared to 69% in 2008).
- Around 400 regulated adult social care services are rated as poor and 3,500 as adequate.
- In care homes for older people, a fifth fail to meet the standard on social contact and activities.
We have also:
- found that councils must help get rid of poor quality care by purchasing from providers more effectively.
- identified councils where improvements in adult social care must be a priority.
- said we will be vigilant about spotting the impact of the economic downturn on people's access to social care.
- committed to raising the bar on councils and providers.
CQC comments
- Watch a video of Cynthia Bower, CQC Chief Executive, speaking about the quality of adult social care
Cynthia Bower, CQC Chief Executive, says:
"It's good to see the steady improvements and this should be recognised. However, I am concerned that many care homes and agencies have more to do to deliver the quality of care expected of them. Those affected should be absolutely clear that we will be very persistent in ensuring they take action in the run up to registration and afterwards, using all the new powers that will be at our disposal.
"There are also serious issues for councils to address in areas such as giving people more control over their care, treating people with dignity, and ensuring commissioning is as effective as possible. I want to see the regulator and councils working in tandem to drive poor quality care out of the market."
"It is striking that many of the issues of most concern to the public - such as dignity - are not necessarily things that cost a lot of money to put right. So there is clearly room to continue improving services, despite the tough economic backdrop. There is no excuse for taking the foot off the gas.
"I have to say however that I am deeply concerned about the potential impact of lower spending on social care. We all know there are choppy waters ahead, so the issue is how well the system responds to the situation. We plan to be particularly vigilant about this on behalf of people who use services."
Further information
This consultation sets out how we propose to integrate equalities and human rights in everything we do. We have incorporated what we think are the key equalities and human rights priorities with the early involvement and engagement of people who use services and the staff we employ. We would like you to help us shape the action plans, so please give us your views.
We ask for feedback specifically on:
- our overall approach to embedding equalities and human rights
- our human rights-based approach
- our priorities for action
- our action plans
We invite all stakeholders and any other interested parties to feed any comments back to us.
Once finalised, we will ensure that relevant measures, timescales and responsible leads are aligned before we publish the final scheme. We will consult more widely, particularly to engage people who are seldom heard, and we will continue our engagement activity throughout the consultation process, and on an ongoing basis, to ensure that the Scheme is "live" and developed in response to what people tell us.
We will collate and analyse all responses and provide feedback on how the consultation informed the development of the Equality and Human Rights Scheme and its action plans.
Consultation document
Equalities and human rights scheme consultation document (PDF, 301KB, opens in new window)
Supporting document
Appendix 1: Legislation requirements (PDF, 48KB, opens in new window)
Send us your responses
Please send us your responses by 25 February 2010.
Respond online
- Fill in the online response form (opens in new window)
Respond by email or post
Download the response form (DOC, 708KB, opens in new window)
- Download the response form in accessible formats and community languages
- Find out how to order printed copies of the consultation documents
Email your completed questionnaire to diversity@cqc.org.uk
Post your response to:
Sue Buker
EHRS Consultation
Care Quality Commission
Finsbury Tower
103-105 Bunhill Row
FREEPOST Lon 15399
London
EC1B 1QW
http://www.cqc.org.uk/getinvolved/consultations/equalityandhumanrightsscheme.cfm



What are community care services
Community care is a complex area. If you're having problems getting community care services, you should consult an experienced adviser, for example, at a Citizens Advice Bureau. To search for details of your nearest CAB
, including those that can give advice by email, click on
nearest CAB.
Community care services are care services that are arranged or provided by the local authority social services department, mainly to adults who have care needs. Community care services include a place in a care home or services to help you carry on living in your home and keep as much independence as possible.
You may need community care services because of your age or because you are disabled or physically or mentally ill.
Back to top
What services may be available
There is a wide range of community care services that you may be entitled to. The following list gives only the main examples:
Care homes
If you need long-term care, and you can’t manage in your own home anymore, one option may be moving into a care home.
All care homes can provide personal care if you need it. This could include help with washing, dressing or going to the toilet. Some care homes can also provide nursing care.
The rules about how charges are made for care homes are different to the rules about charging for other community care services.
For more information about care homes, including how charges are made, see Care homes.
Home care services
Home care services generally mean help with personal tasks, for example, bathing and washing, getting up and going to bed, shopping and managing finances. Providing home care involves someone coming to your home at agreed times. This could be two or three times a day or even 24-hour care where necessary.
Home helps
Home helps can provide assistance with general domestic tasks including cleaning and cooking and may be particularly important in maintaining hygiene in the home.
Adaptations to the home
Adaptations to the home could be major or minor and can be particularly important in allowing you to remain at home. Major adaptations could include, for example, the installation of a stair lift or downstairs lavatory or the lowering of work tops in the kitchen. Minor adaptations would include, for example, hand rails in the bathroom.
Meals
The provision of meals as a community care service could mean a daily delivery of a meal or, in some areas, the delivery of a weekly or monthly supply of frozen food. It could also mean providing meals at a day centre or lunch club.
Recreational and occupational activities
The local authority social services department can provide a range of recreational, occupational, educational and cultural activities, for example, at a day centre. These activities could include lectures, games, outings, and help with living skills and budgeting. The local authority social services department may also provide transport to enable you to make use of the facilities.
The local authority social services department may also be able to provide radio, televisions or visiting library services.
Back to top
How to get a community care service
Unless you urgently need services, you will have to have your needs assessed by the local authority social services department before they will provide services for you. This is called a community care assessment. The local authority social services department must carry out an assessment for anyone who appears to need a community care service because they are, for example, elderly, disabled or suffering from a physical or mental illness.
If you think that you need community care services, you should contact your local authority social services department and ask for an assessment. A carer, friend or relative can also ask for an assessment on your behalf.
It may be that, after you've contacted the local authority social services department, there are problems with an assessment. If so, you may need to contact a specialist adviser, for example, at a Citizens Advice Bureau. To search for details of your nearest CAB
, including those that can give advice by e-mail, click on
nearest CAB.
Back to top
How an assessment is carried out
An assessment is carried out by someone from or acting on behalf of the local authority social services department. More than one person could be involved in carrying out the assessment, including a social worker, a physiotherapist and an occupational therapist. The assessment procedure may involve filling in a form but this will vary from area to area.
The assessment should take into account:
What happens after an assessment
Once an assessment has been carried out, the local authority social services department has to decide whether you are entitled to services to meet your needs. This is based on your level of need, not on how much money you have. Entitlement to services is a complicated area.
If your local authority social services department says that you aren't entitled to community care services, you should get advice, for example, from a Citizens Advice Bureau. To search for details of your nearest CAB
, including those who can give advice by e-mail, click on
nearest CAB.
If the local authority social services department is going to provide services, the services must be set out in a care plan. You should be given the care plan in writing if you request it. The care plan will set out:
Assessment for a carer
A carer is someone like a relative or friend who takes responsibility for looking after a disabled, ill or elderly person and who does not provide the care as part of a job or as a volunteer with a voluntary organisation. Some carers provide care for a few hours a week, others for 24 hours a day, every day. A carer does not have to be living with the person being cared for.
You are entitled to ask for your needs as a carer to be assessed when an assessment is being carried out for the person you care for. You can ask to be assessed even if the person you care for is entitled to an assessment but does not want one. Some carers of disabled children can also have an assessment. In Scotland, local authority social services departments must consider the views of both the carer and the person cared for when they carry out any assessment.
In England and Wales, local authority social services departments can provide services directly to carers and offer you direct payments for your own needs. However, the results of the carer’s assessment must be taken into account when they decide what community care services the person being cared for will receive.
If, after contacting the local social services department, you have problems with an assessment, it may be necessary to contact a specialist adviser, for example, at a Citizens Advice Bureau. To search for details of your nearest CAB
, including those who can give advice by e-mail, click on
nearest CAB.
Back to top
Paying for community care services
The rules about which community care services must be paid for, and how much can be charged, are complicated. If you want information on this, you should consult an experienced adviser, for example, at a Citizens Advice Bureau. To search for details of your nearest CAB
, including those who can give advice by e-mail, click on
nearest CAB.
The local authority social services department can charge for providing some community care services. Some local authorities only charge for some services, for example, meals on wheels or home helps, while others charge for all the services they are allowed to charge for.
The information below does not cover charges for care homes.
For more information about how charges are made for care homes, see Care homes.
If you’re a carer in England and Wales and you get services for your needs, you can be charged for those services.
If you live in Scotland, are aged 65 or over, and get personal care or personal support care at home, you should get this free. If the local authority refuses to provide a service for free, you can challenge the decision. You could then make a complaint to the Scottish Public Services Ombudsman.
A local authority social services department must make information about charges generally available. If you are having your community care needs assessed by the local authority social services department (and in England and Wales, if you are having your needs as a carer assessed), you must also be given full information on charges for any services provided.
Some local authority social services departments make a flat rate charge for a service, for example, meals on wheels. Others may want to know how much income and savings you have and then charge according to a sliding scale. In Scotland, local authority social services departments have to treat people claiming benefit 'sympathetically' when they are charged for community care services.
In England and Wales, local authority social services departments must follow the following Government guidance when they assess how much you can pay for services:
In Scotland, local authority social services departments should follow the guidance about charges produced by the Convention of Scottish Local Authorities (COSLA). This guidance can be found on their website at
www.cosla.gov.uk.
If you have been asked to pay for services and you think the charges are unreasonable or you can't afford to pay them, you can ask for the charges to be reviewed.
If you want to challenge charges, you should consult an experienced adviser, for example, at a Citizens Advice Bureau. To search for details of your nearest CAB
, including those who can give advice by e-mail, click on
nearest CAB.
Back to top
Direct payments
Direct payments are payments of money a local authority social services department makes to people to arrange their own community care services, instead of the local authority arranging the services.
In England and Northern Ireland, if you're entitled to get community care services, your local authority social services department must give you the option of getting direct payments, as long as you are able to manage a direct payment.
In Wales, a local authority social services department must offer direct payments to:
In Scotland, a local authority social services department must offer direct payments for certain services to all eligible people. Eligible people include:
The amount of direct payments you get should cover the cost of buying services to meet your needs. This includes any extra costs you have to pay in order to get the service. For example, if you employ your own carer, you will have to pay recruitment costs, holiday and sick pay and insurance.
In the same way that you may have to pay for services arranged by the local authority social services department, you may have to make a contribution towards the cost of services you are buying with direct payments. The local authority social services department will work this out in the same way it works out how much you have to pay towards services it arranges itself (see heading Paying for community care services). They will either deduct your contribution before paying you the direct payment or pay the direct payment in full and you will have to pay your contribution back.
If you're offered a direct payment, you do not have to accept it if you would rather have services arranged by the local authority social services department.
If you do get direct payments, you will have to arrange your own services. Local support organisations may be able to help you with these arrangements.
The National Centre for Independent Living holds a list of these organisations. You can contact them at:-
The National Centre for Independent Living
www.ncil.org.uk
250 Kennington Lane
London
SE11 5RD
Tel: 020 7587 1663
Fax: 020 7582 2469
Textphone: 020 7587 1177
Website:
Back to top
Complaints
If you are not satisfied with the standard of community care services offered by your local authority, you may be able to make a complaint. You can get in touch with them to find out about their complaints procedure.
For more information about how to make a complaint in England, see NHS and local authority social services complaints. In Scotland, see NHS complaints, and in Wales, see NHS complaints in Wales. In Northern Ireland, see HPSS complaints in Northern Ireland.
Back to top
Other help
If you need community care services because you are disabled, make sure that you are also claiming all the benefits you are entitled to. There may be other support available, for example, travel concessions. You may be able to apply to the Independent Living Funds (ILF) for money to help you live at home instead of in residential care. The ILF works closely with local authorities to provide money to pay for someone to help you at home.
For more information about benefits, see Benefits for people who are sick and disabled.
For more information about travel concessions, see Transport options for disabled people.
For more information about the ILF, see Financial support for severely disabled people - The Independent Living Funds.
Back to top
http://www.adviceguide.org.uk/index/family_parent/family/community_care.htm