The Mayor presented his final draft consolidated budget for 2010/11 to the London Assembly on 10 February 2010, and it was agreed unamended. The band D council tax for this budget remains unchanged at £309.82.
Under this selection, I will publish the correspondant received from each local authority requesting the budget and spending from which partly is funded using the Dept. of Health AIDS support grant.
| Attachment | Size |
|---|---|
| LBNewham0910.doc | 53 KB |
| LBRichmond0910.doc | 34.5 KB |
Please note as more data comes in the file linked here will be automatically updated. So come back and check regularly.
| Organisation | Income | Costs | Profit/Loss | |
| The Food Chain 2006/2007 | 171,468 | 165,399 | 6,069 | |
| Body and Soul 2007/2008 | 633,523 | 870,768 | 0 | |
| Crusaid - 2007/2008 | 1,933,650 | 1,864,764 | 68,886 | |
| NAM - 2007/2008 | 1,163,679 | 1,213,688 | 50,009 | |
| NAT - 2007/08 | 922,200 | 865,700 | 56,500 | |
| NAZ 2007/2008 | 712,012 | 639,778 | 72,234 | |
| Positive East 2007/2008 | 23,127 | 39,969 | 16,842 | |
| Positive Place 2007/2008 | 486,149 | 490,593 | 4,444 | |
| THT - 2007/08 | 15,816,000 | 15,875,000 | 59,000 | |
| AVERT - 2008/2009 | 504,174 | 515,716 | 11,542 | |
| GMFA - 2008/2009 | 718,753 | 681,043 | 37,710 | |
| Positive Women - 2008/2009 | 586,802 | 593,719 | 6,917 | |
| Stonewall - 2008/2009 | 3,059,255 | 2,721,620 | 337,635 | |
| 26,730,792 | 26,537,757 | 430,280 | ||
| Department of Health - 2007/08 | 16,500,000 | |||
| Department of Health - 2008/09 | 19,100,000 | |||
| Department of Health - 2009/10 | 21,500,000 |
FOI request received from the London Borough of Kensington & Chelsea
FOI request received from the London Borough of Bromley
Click here for the Capital Grant 2008/09 including HIV Capital Grant from Bromley.
FOI response received from the LB Barking and Dageham
FOI response received from the LB Hammersmith & Fulham
I have written to NHS London using the Freedom of Information Act http://www.london.nhs.uk/ requesting further information about HIV/AIDS spending and budgets from the point of each local primary care trust.
LB Sutton reposnse to FOI request
The Manifesto for Londoners sets out London Councils' case for devolution of powers from Whitehall and quangos to London boroughs to enable us to meet the economic and social challenge of doing more, and better, with less.
The manifesto examines the position of London as uniquely suited for devolution, looking at its strengths and notable successes as well as the difficulties posed by its diversity and inequality.
To help London boroughs deliver more for Londoners, the manifesto sets out some key areas where devolution would improve services and reduce costs:
- Health and social care
- Worklessness
- Adult skills
- Local policing
- Community justice and offender management
- Child safety and achievement
- Transport
- Housing and investment
- Climate change and retrofitting
- Public places and public behaviour
- The deal for devolution
Read a short summary of proposals in each of these policy areas on the 'manifesto in summary' page
Next steps
Behind the manifesto, we are working towards more detailed business cases that show how boroughs, building on what they have already put in place individually and in groups, can deliver for Londoners.
Your comments
We'd like to hear your comments and opinions on the manifesto. You can add any comments below and read what others have been saying...
related documents
Manifesto for Londoners (PDF, 1,707.16Kb)
http://www.londoncouncils.gov.uk/aboutus/corporatepublications/manifesto/default.htm
For many months now there has been mounting anecdotal evidence that the capital finance system in London's 33 local authorities is under increasing pressure, from both a decline in capital receipts and a virtual halt to all private sector regeneration and investment.
In response, London Councils commissioned LG Futures to work with boroughs to analyse the scale of the problem and identify ways in which capital investment could be (re-)enabled.
The focus of this booklet is to highlight the actions London boroughs need central government to take if the capital finance system is to operate more effectively at the local level.
London Councils believes that if the government proactively works with us to swiftly advance our recommendations the capital finance system can provide the framework to re-enable the investment the capital's residents and economy need to accelerate London out of recession.
download publication
http://www.londoncouncils.gov.uk/localgovernmentfinance/publications/cap...
Transport is seen as the single biggest challenge facing disabled people in achieving more independence. However, there is no cohesive 'vision' or medium to long-term plan for door-to-door and assisted transport services across London.
London Councils is working to identify a high-level strategy for door-to-door services, particularly those that are funded by London Boroughs, including Taxicard. The strategy is to set out a vision and overarching approach with Boroughs at the centre, supported by Transport for London and other partners.
The aim is to provide effective, efficient, value for money and high-quality door-to-door services that meet the needs of users, and which can be provided within current funding.
This report is the first step in developing that strategy, placing Boroughs at the centre, with TfL providing funding support.
<!-- String Builder Processed - Module 103 processed --><!--Exec time module 103 = 0-->
download publication
A Future Door-to-Door Strategy for London (PDF, 465.02Kb)
http://www.londoncouncils.gov.uk/Transport/Publications/doortodoorstrate...
Transport and Environment Committee - 10/12/2009 14:30:00
Item 13 - DfT Consultation on Special Grant Funding on 2010/11 for the National Bus Concession
<!-- Generated by XStandard version 1.7.1.0 on 2009-12-03T12:07:40 -->
Summary
This report seeks members agreement to the London Councils’ response to the Department for Transport (DfT) consultation on changing the level of special grant for the national bus concession in 2010/11
Recommendations
Members are asked to consider and agree the draft response, taking account of the views of Leaders’ Committee on 8 December which will be reported orally.
<!-- String Builder Processed - Module 65 processed --><!--Exec time module 65 = 0-->
related documents
http://www.londoncouncils.gov.uk/committees/agenda.htm?pk_agenda_items=3806
The results of the tendering round for the London Councils ESF Co-financing Programme 2010-12 have now been published. 30 projects have initially been recommended for funding; the award of grant to these organisation is subject to pre-contract negotiations. There is an appeal process which is open to all unsuccessful applicants.
Please see the documents below for details of the recommended projects and scores awarded, the appeal procedure and the report to the external appraisal panel about the recommendations.
- ESF External report Opens in a new window
- ESF Score summary Opens in a new window
- ESF Appeals Procedure Opens in a new window
Please note that in conjunction with the score summary, it is important to read the external panel report because this gives further reasoning behind the choices made, particularly where the highest scoring project is not the one recommended for funding. As inidcated on page 48 of the prospectus, the appraisal panels have a remit to ensure that projects funded under the programme collectively target the whole range of target groups, that there is a good mix of projects delivering work placements and that there is a fair spread of projects geographically across London related to need and this means that the highest scoring tenders have not been recommended for funding in each case.
http://www.londoncouncils.gov.uk/grants/esf/TenderingResults201012.htm
Response to Freedom of Information request on HIV AIDs Support Grant and council spending on HIV service provision in the London Borough of Merton - click here.
Due to an inaccuracy with the figures provided initially by Merton we sought clarification. Here is the response "I had a monthly meeting with our departmental accountant yesterday as a routine procedure and we looked at the Aids Support Grant for more details. It transpires that Kevin is right in saying that Merton receives £198k pa for the ASG. (Apologies for my error as I obtained the previous figure from a report but it has proven not to be accurate). However, our accountant pointed out that our under-spent on the ASG is currently at £15K (not as much as Kevin has predicted) this financial year, there are budget commitments on care packages that include home care and residential care."
One in three accident and emergency (A&E) departments could close across London, the BBC

has learned.
|
Most computers will open PDF documents automatically, but you may need to download Adobe Acrobat Reader.
|
Eleven units are under threat from closure, under reorganisation plans by NHS London. There are currently 31 A&Es in the capital.
Six of these may go in the west of the city alone, according to plans by the North West London Commissioning Partnership (NWLCP), seen by BBC

London.
A&E services at Chase Farm Hospital, in Enfield, north London, and Queens Mary's Hospital in Sidcup, south London, are listed for closure.
The closure of the A&E department at King George Hospital in Ilford, east London, is also being consulted on.
And concerns have been raised by MPs in south-west London about the future of A&E services at Kingston Hospital.
Whittington Hospital may have to merge its A&E with the Royal Free Hospital, according to NHS plans which are going out for consultation.
Departments reorganised
The departments are being reorganised by the NHS as part of a city-wide review of how health services are delivered.
As a part of this shake up, the NWLCP is considering plans to shut five of the eight A&Es in the north-west London sector.
The current eight A&Es in the area are: Ealing Hospital, Hillingdon, Northwick Park, Central Middlesex, Chelsea and Westminster, St Mary's, West Middlesex and Charing Cross.
The NWLCP said one of the weaknesses in the health services for the area was the "current overprovision of certain specialties such as A&E and maternity" which was causing "financial and quality issues".
The document, entitled NWL Sector Integrated Strategic Plan 2009 - 2014, said St Mary's in Paddington would remain as an A&E, as it has already been designated a major trauma centre by NHS London.
|
NHS London
|
The other two are yet to be decided. But the NHS said more should close.
In giving its feedback on NWLCP's plans, NHS London said: "On the basis of an initial review we have a concern that three Major Acute Hospital (MAH) sites are clinically and financially unsustainable."
It added: "Given our misgivings, you should review this issue further and have helpfully agreed to refer to a 'maximum of three' MAHs in order to prepare the ground for the next stage."
The health authority also advised NWLCP that it should make it clear that there is the possibility that some hospitals may close to be replaced by polyclinics.
Describing NWLCP's plans for polyclinics as "weak", it said: "Turning to your proposals for local hospitals and elective centres, there is no reference to the numbers you believe to be sustainable across the sector.
"I know that you have a programme in place for reviewing all hospital care settings and the plan should, at least, signal the likelihood that not all the current sites will make the transition to either MAH or local hospital."
Rory Shaw, from the NWLCP, said: "There are no formal plans as yet for A&Es.
"This plan is about centralisation of some services in fewer locations.
"We want to centralise trauma in centres where there are teams who are good at this, and do it everyday."
Last week, BBC

London reported at least six A&Es could close across the city.
When asked about the six potential closures Ruth Carnal, head of NHS London, told the BBC

she "did not recognise this figure".
NHS London has revealed plans for more than 100 polyclinics across the capital over the next five years, which will offer a wider range of services in one place.
But an NHS London spokesman insisted: "Polyclinics will not replace A&Es.
"They are being introduced to make it quicker and easier for Londoners to access to the care they need."
Download Fair Society, Healthy Lives - The Marmot Review Final Report (25Mb)
Download Fair Society, Healthy Lives - The Marmot Review Executive Summary (8Mb)
Go to the Documents Section for individual chapters, background documents and press documents.
Please visit www.marmot-review.org.uk for information on the Marmot Review Conference.
The Review followed the publication of the global Commission on Social Determinants of Health, also chaired by Sir Michael Marmot and published by the WHO. The CSDH advocated that national governments develop and implement strategies and policies suited to their particular national context aimed at improving health equity. The English review is a response to that recommendation and to the government's commitment to reducing health inequalities in England.
The aim of the Review was to propose an evidence based strategy for reducing health inequalities from 2010. The strategy includes policies and interventions that address the social determinants of health inequalities.
The Review had four tasks:
(i) identify, for the health inequalities challenge facing England, the evidence most relevant to underpinning future policy and action
(ii) show how this evidence could be translated into practice
(iii) advise on possible objectives and measures, building on the experience of the current PSA target on infant mortality and life expectancy
(iv) publish a report of the review's work that will contribute to the development of a post-2010 health inequalities strategy
It is anticipated that the Review will also have relevance for other countries developing strategies aimed at tackling health inequalities, following the recommendations of the CSDH.
You can find further details in the documents section.
http://www.ucl.ac.uk/gheg/marmotreview
This FOI request made March 2009, I have removed the requesters name.
2 March 2009
Dear Sir or Madam,
I am looking for information on how much total grant money was
allocated to community/voluntary organizations by your council each
year between 1998 and 2009, and which community organizations
received how much grant money each year between 1998 and 2009.
http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/grant_allocations_4#incoming-23685
Dear Sir or Madam,
I am looking for information on how much total grant money was
allocated to community/voluntary organizations by your council each
year between 1998 and 2009, and which community organizations
received how much grant money each year between 1998 and 2009.
http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/grant_allocations_20#incoming-23543 (LB of Newham)
http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/grant_allocations_8#incoming-22472 9 (LB of Hackney)
Dear Sir or Madam,
I am looking for information on how much total grant money was
allocated to community/voluntary organizations by your council each
year between 1998 and 2009, and which community organizations
received how much grant money each year between 1998 and 2009.
http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/grant_allocations#incoming-22336 (LB of Bexley)
http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/grant_allocations_5#incoming-21222 (LB of Ealing)
http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/grant_allocations_10#incoming-21049 (LB of Haringey)
http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/grant_allocations_17#incoming-25085 (LB of Lambeth)
http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/grant_allocations_9#incoming-22469 (LB of Hammersmith and Fulham)
http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/grant_allocations_30#incoming-23192 (LB of Havering)
http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/grant_allocations_11#incoming-20823 (LB of Harrow)
http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/grant_allocations_15#incoming-19915 (RLB of Kingston upon Thames)
http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/grant_allocations_7#incoming-22433 (RLB of Greenwich)
http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/grant_allocations_14#outgoing-17265 (LB of Islington)
http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/grant_allocations_21#incoming-22904 (LB of Redbridge)
http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/grant_allocations_26#incoming-22307 (LB of Waltham Forest)
http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/communityvoluntary_sector_grant#in... (LB of Barking & Dagenham)
http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/communityvoluntary_sector_grant_2 (LB of Barnet)
http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/grant_allocations_2 (LB of Brent)
http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/grant_allocations_3 (LB of Camden)
http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/grant_allocations_4 (LB of Croydon)
http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/grant_allocations_6 (LB of Enfield)
http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/grant_allocations_13 (LB of Hounslow)
http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/grant_allocations_16 (LB of Kensington & Chelsea)
http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/grant_allocations_18 (LB of Lewisham)
http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/grant_allocations_19 (LB of Merton)
http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/grant_allocations_22 (RLB of Richmond)
http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/grant_allocations_23 (LB of Southwark)
http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/grant_allocations_24 (LB of Sutton)
http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/grant_allocations_25 (LB of Tower Hamlets)
http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/grant_allocations_27 (LB of Wandsworth)
http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/grant_allocations_28 (LB of Westminister)
http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/grant_allocations_29 (LB of Bromley)
SOUTH LONDON HIV PARTNERSHIP FUNDING AND TARGETS - FOI request.
http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/south_london_hiv_partnership_fun
Housing Minister Baroness Andrews today announced how much funding each local authority will get to help disabled and older people stay in their homes through the Disabled Facilities Grant Programme. The Government is making £157m available to local authorities in England for 2009-10 through the programme, with over 230 local authorities receiving an increase.
Baroness Andrews said:
"This funding provides a lifeline to thousands of disabled and older people across the country, which is why we have increased the grant again this year.
"Providing something as simple as a ramp can really make the difference between being able to stay in your home and having to leave and this is exactly how the Disabled Facilities Grant helps - it gives people the opportunity to stay in their homes and communities, near friends and family."
The Disabled Facilities Grant programme has seen successive increases in funding in recent years increasing from £57million in 1997 to £146million in 2008-09. This funding helps around 37,000 disabled and older people each year to live as comfortably and independently as possible in their own homes through the provision of adaptations such as stair lifts and level access showers.
This year the Government also made changes to assist ex- service personnel with applying for a Disabled Facilities Grant, following the MOD command paper published in the summer. Amongst the commitments contained in the paper is that MOD compensation schemes for the most severely disabled personnel will be exempt from the Disabled Facilities Grant financial test. These changes will come into force on the 31 December 2008.
Notes to editors
DFG allocations in 2009/10
1. The Government Offices for the Regions allocated the regional budget using local knowledge of demand and pressures along with disability needs indicators.
2. The allocations to each local authority can be found in detail on the Communities and Local Government website at: www.communities.gov.uk/housing/supportandadaptations/housingadaptations/localauthoritydfgallocations/. Government Offices will be writing out to individual local authorities with the details in the near future.
3. The Government has substantially increased funding for the DFG programme as set out in the table below:
| 1997/98 | 56 |
| 1998/99 | 59 |
| 1999/00 | 65 |
| 2000/01 | 72 |
| 2001/02 | 87 |
| 2002/03 | 88 |
| 2003/04 | 99 |
| 2004/05 | 101.5 |
| 2005/06 | 103.3 |
| 2006/07 | 121 |
| 2007/08 | 127 |
| 2008/09 | 146 |
| 2009/10 | 157 |
4. These figures represent the contribution the Government plans to spend on DFGs during 2009/10. Local Authorities are required to contribute any expenditure above these allocations from other resources.
Capital Spending Plan 2010/11
The Mayor is required, under section 122 of the Greater London Authority (GLA) Act 1999, to prepare, for each financial year, a capital spending plan for the functional bodies: Metropolitan Police Authority (MPA), London Fire and Emergency Planning Authority (LFEPA), Transport for London (TfL) and London Development Agency (LDA). The final Capital Spending Plan for 2010/11 was published on 26 February 2010.
Final Capital Spending Plan 2010/11 PDF
Final Capital Spending Plan 2010/11 RTF
The GLA's consolidated budget 2010/11
The Mayor presented his final draft consolidated budget for 2010/11 to the London Assembly on 10 February 2010, and it was agreed unamended. The band D council tax for this budget remains unchanged at £309.82.
Final draft consolidated budget 2010/11 - full document PDF (500kb)
The RTF version is in three parts:
Final draft consolidated budget 2010/11 part 1 RTF (243kb)
Final draft consolidated budget 2010/11 part 2 RTF (1.5Mb)
Final draft consolidated budget 2010/11 part 3 RTF (226kb)
Draft consolidated budget
The Mayor published his draft consolidated budget for 2010/11 on 19 January 2010. It is in three parts:
- The Mayor's background statement and calculations
- Explanation of draft consolidated budget proposals
- Finance and legal advice
Draft consolidated budget 2010/11 - full document PDF (427kb)
The RTF version is in three parts:
Draft consolidated budget 2010/11 part 1 RTF (288kb)
Draft consolidated budget 2010/11 part 2 RTF (1.5Mb)
Draft consolidated budget 2010/11 part 3 RTF (220kb)
Draft Capital Spending Plan 2010/11
The Mayor has prepared a draft Capital Spending Plan under section 122 of the Greater London Authority (GLA) Act 1999 for the functional bodies: Metropolitan Police Authority (MPA), London Fire and Emergency Planning Authority (LFEPA), Transport for London (TfL) and London Development Agency (LDA). This was published on 14 January 2010 for consultation with the London Assembly and each functional body, for which the deadline for responses is 5 February 2010. The final plan must be determined before 28 February.
Draft Capital Spending Plan 2010/11 PDF (400kb)
Draft Capital Spending Plan 2010/11 RTF (2.9Mb)
The London Assembly published its response to the Mayor's Draft Capital Spending Plan 2010/11.
Consultation budget
On 10 December 2009 the Mayor published his consultation budget for the GLA and Functional Bodies for 2010/11:
GLA Group Budget Proposals and Precepts 2010/11 PDF
GLA Group Budget Proposals and Precepts 2010/11 RTF
Comments on the proposals contained in this document were invited, to be submitted by 11 January 2010.
The London Assembly published its response to the Mayor's draft consultaton budget 2010/11.
Background documents
Budget guidance for the financial year 2010/11 was published in July 2009:
2010/11 Budget guidance PDF
2010/11 Budget guidance RTF
http://www.london.gov.uk/who-runs-london/greater-london-authority/budget...
The experiences and concerns of older people accessing home care in London are documented in this Health and Public Services Committee report, which reveals many are struggling to navigate their way through the current system.
Older people in the capital told the Health and Public Services Committee that the process for assessments can be complicated, opaque and long-winded, leading to many people facing long delays. The report says more than 1700 older people in London waited more than three months for an assessment and more than 1500 faced delays of at least six weeks following a successful assessment to receive all their services. It says many have problems accessing the home care they need because local authorities are dealing with a growing older population and other major pressures on their budgets. In addition, older Londoners are more likely to need home care than older people elsewhere because they are more likely to live alone, in poverty, in poor health and without local family support.
The report makes a number of recommendations to improve older people’s experience of the homecare system in the short-term:
- The Department of Health London Region should develop guidance on fast and effective assessment processes for people who want personal budgets
- The Mayor should promote preventative services that can plug the gap for people with lower care needs
- The Mayor should assess the feasibility of setting up a pan-London frontline information line for older Londoners.
| Attachment | Size |
|---|---|
| Home truths: older Londoners' access to home care services PDF | 545.69 KB |
| Home truths: older Londoners' access to home care services RTF | 2.05 MB |
| Home truths submissions Part 1 PDF | 291.94 KB |
| Home truths submissions Part 1 RTF | 300.94 KB |
| Home truths submissions Part 2 PDF | 243.75 KB |
| Home truths submissions Part 2 RTF | 305.11 KB |
http://www.london.gov.uk/who-runs-london/the-london-assembly/publication...
The government's unpredictable and unstable system of allocating funding to local councils should be frozen until a fairer and more reliable system can be developed, London Councils warned today.
The warning comes following the publication of the latest in London Councils' series of finance lobbying leaflets Four block muddle.
The publication explains why the current 'four block funding' model is so unstable and sets out why freezing the formula grant provided to local authorities until 2014 is desirable.
The current four block model is used to distribute £29 billion annually from central government to fund local authority services.
Funding is allocated to each local authority based on four factors or 'blocks' - the needs of their local area; their capacity to raise council tax to fund services; a damping mechanism to ensure local authorities receive a minimum increase in funding; and a fourth 'central block' which links each local authority's funding to a 'threshold authority'.
The central, fourth block, introduced in 2006/07, makes all funding relative to the needs of the threshold authority - a benchmark with which to determine high and low need.
This has unfortunately reduced the transparency and clarity of the system, because an individual local authority's needs and resources no longer translate directly into funding.
Even worse, a tiny change to the threshold authority's needs now leads to huge amounts of funding having to move around the country - not because each authority's needs change, but because the system dictates that it should.
For education and personal social services, the benchmark authority is Wokingham; a 1 per cent change to its needs causes the Metropolitan Police Authority grant to increase by £4.8 million and Hampshire's to reduce by £2.5 million. In total, £41 million moves around local authorities in England.
London Councils believes that for distribution of over £29 billion funding to be allocated through such an unstable system is perverse.
Until a new system can be designed which has the active support of local authorities in every region in England, London Councils wants the formula grant, with all its statistical calculations and funding floors, to be frozen.
This would provide local authorities with some much-needed stability through a period of economic uncertainty and allow central government time to work up a more robust and equitable system.
London Councils' Chairman Councillor Merrick Cockell said:
"It's quite clear that the four block funding model is not fit to allocate billions of pounds around the country. Its effects range from the baffling to the perverse.
"The government must freeze the system until a more robust and transparent system can take its place. While this won't immediately correct the system's many injustices, it will at least provide local authorities with some much needed clarity and stability to work with."
Notes to editors
To read the full publication please visit http://www.londoncouncils.gov.uk/fourblockmuddle
http://www.londoncouncils.gov.uk/media/current/pressdetail.htm?pk=962&sh...
NAT (National AIDS Trust) has today announced the findings from its independent review of the AIDS Support Grant. The Grant, worth £21.8million in 2009/10, is a ring-fenced fund distributed to local authorities to spend specifically on the social care needs of people living with HIV. The independent review, the first ever of the Grant, identified examples of good practice and makes recommendations for local authorities about how use of the Grant can be improved in the future.

Item 13 - DfT Consultation on Special Grant Funding on 2010/11 for the National Bus Concession
Response to Freedom of Information request on HIV AIDs Support Grant and council spending on HIV service provision in London Borough of Lambeth - click here.