Widespread public confusion remains over how the adult care system works, two years after councils in England were set personalisation targets to improve information and advice for citizens, research has found.
A survey of 1,300 people by older people's charity Counsel and Care found only 5% believe the care system is easy to navigate, while 79% thought too little was done to tell people about their care options.
In September 2008, councils were set targets under the Putting People First programme to have a strategy to deliver universal information and advice services on care by April 2010 and to be delivering them by next month.
Counsel and Care found confusion over entitlements to care or assessments. More than four in 10 respondents did not think councils offered a free assessment of older people's needs, as they should do. Although seven in 10 believed their council would help them if they were physically disabled, only 53% thought they would receive help for mental health problems.
Just over half said they would turn to the local authority or social services for information on care for older people but seven in 10 said they would use the internet. Nearly two-thirds had not thought about how to fund their own care,
Counsel and Care policy manager Caroline Bernard said she believed impending cuts to public spending had played a part in preventing improvements in councils' advice services. She said they needed to be broader in their communication strategies when publicising social care and not rely on monthly magazines.
Mark Cheverton, managing director of Opportunity Links, said: "This research highlights once again that, without a strategic approach to information and advice, social care costs will only increase as people lack the support to make the best choices about their care."
However, council heads said information provision had improved.
"Anyone who has used services in the past year will have noticed an improvement in information," said David Rogers, chair of the Local Government Association's community well-being board.
He said the complexity of the social care system was at the root of the problem and wholesale reform was necessary. He said councils had been focused on communicating how the system works to those using services but that local and central government needed to increase understanding of the system.
http://www.communitycare.co.uk/Articles/2010/09/03/115248/adult-care-sys...


Elderly people fear that care services for the over-65s will be the first thing to be cut by councils struggling to balance their budgets.
A survey by care provider, Anchor, revealed that 69% of over-65s shares this concern, while six out of 10 people believe they will not be able to access high quality care as a result of cuts.
The survey also revealed that 45% thought cuts would increase the likelihood of people having to sell their homes to pay for care.
People in the north of England showed the most concern about the cuts and 47% said they were more concerned now than they were before the General Election in May this year.
The survey also revealed a degree of cynicism about politicians. Across England, 59% said they believed politicians were less interested in older people's issues than they were before the election.
Andy Burnham, former secretary of state for health and a Labour leadership candidate, said: "We should be celebrating our ageing society, but instead the way our care system operates and the proposals for means-testing of benefits that are being mooted by the coalition shows a flagrant disrespect for older people."
Burnham has made his push for a National Care Service, free at the point of delivery a cornerstone of his Labour leadership campaign.
Jane Ashcroft, chief executive of Anchor, said there needed to be an honest dialogue about protecting the care of older people ahead of the government's comprehensive spending review in October. She added: "Most significant is the sheer number of people worried about selling their home to pay for long-term care - the very problem the government has pledged to address."
Several councils have already announced plans for cuts to services. Among them is Bromley Council which plans to cut in-house care provision.
Meanwhile Derbyshire has raised its eligibility threshold to substantial and experts fear many more councils are set to follow.
Service users can also expect to pay more in contributions to care as a wave of councils are considering raising maximum charges for non-residential services.
The Department of Health is yet to comment.
http://www.communitycare.co.uk/Articles/2010/09/06/115256/elderly-people...